Re: England Selection : Tue Apr 25, 2023 11:40 am
FearTheVee wrote:
The lad is currently injured and coming back from an Achilles injury. If your point is do players play injured in meaningful games but less so in friendlies then of course the answer is a resounding yes. You are also assuming he’s pulled out without Wane’s knowledge. That may be the case, it may not. He wouldn’t have played so maybe Wane thinks allowing an injured player rest is better than bringing him into a squad for a game he wont play in.
I didn’t say Lomax not playing justifies pulling out. I said him and Lees were the controversial ones but in reality Lomax wouldn’t play. It was more a point that it doesn’t really impact Wane and England.
Don’t get me wrong - I’m a big international RL fan (see my avatar and the cash I’ve spent travelling the world watching England/GB) and o don’t believe in players picking and choosing and o believe being in camp is an important part of building a winning culture and winning team.
As I said earlier two pull outs are two too many. Then again - had the game been England exiles last week nobody would have believed saints withdrawing Walmsley, Paasi, Sironen, Matautia, Makinson, Percival, Knowles etc due to injury but players get injured week to week.
As I said - I think Lomax and Lees are the questionable ones, Dodd is a non-event as he’s playing injured.
I didn’t say Lomax not playing justifies pulling out. I said him and Lees were the controversial ones but in reality Lomax wouldn’t play. It was more a point that it doesn’t really impact Wane and England.
Don’t get me wrong - I’m a big international RL fan (see my avatar and the cash I’ve spent travelling the world watching England/GB) and o don’t believe in players picking and choosing and o believe being in camp is an important part of building a winning culture and winning team.
As I said earlier two pull outs are two too many. Then again - had the game been England exiles last week nobody would have believed saints withdrawing Walmsley, Paasi, Sironen, Matautia, Makinson, Percival, Knowles etc due to injury but players get injured week to week.
As I said - I think Lomax and Lees are the questionable ones, Dodd is a non-event as he’s playing injured.
We'll have to agree to differ on Dodd. He's not currently 'injured'. If you're using his not kicking as proof (and I use the term loosely), I'll put the counter argument that he's in all probability not kicking because of his Achilles. He may we'll be 'coming back' from an injury but as far as I'm concerned doing a full 80 is comeback complete. How many full 80s constitute a recovery in your opinion?
No excuse for Lomax and Lees. We agree there, as we do on Knowles etc.