Genuine question about the rules - is there still one for ungentlemanly conduct?
The reason is ask is Bentley. Now he didn't actually do anything wrong on Friday, but he was in everyone's ear, antagonising and, in some respects, masterfully playing opposition players. Surely the refs aren't that dumb (maybe they probably are) that they can't realise that he's not helping matters and making their jobs harder.
Bentley, like Connor, is a repeat offender. Time and time again however, it's the person who reacts who gets the penalty against them.