: Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:44 pm  

: Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:10 pm  

RB wrote: lol at the disciplinary review http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... php?id=705 Sounds like it's been written by a work experience kid with all the spelling mistakes. that is a disgrace. "Richie was punished by way of a temporary dismissal rather than a deliberate action." "No doubt that this is clearly a trip. Could have tackled him, you didn't you raised your foot and tripped him. The greading of the match review panel is." greading? "Spent ten minutes in the season."

RB wrote: lol at the disciplinary review http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... php?id=705 Sounds like it's been written by a work experience kid with all the spelling mistakes. that is a disgrace. "Richie was punished by way of a temporary dismissal rather than a deliberate action." "No doubt that this is clearly a trip. Could have tackled him, you didn't you raised your foot and tripped him. The greading of the match review panel is." greading? "Spent ten minutes in the season."

: Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:07 pm  

I think he probably would have only got one game if he hadn't got himself red carded twice last year. He's becoming a regular offender so they'll come down harder on him each time.

: Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:25 pm  

JTB wrote:

"Richard has got a pretty good record"

How does 2 sendings off last season equate to a 'pretty good record'?

Well he was the only player to achieve that milestone so that makes him the top man in his field. That's pretty good isn't it?

: Mon Feb 16, 2009 6:38 pm  

Captain13 wrote:

If that happens il shave my head with a tatty peeler!

Roberts at FB again with carmont and Bailey as centres as you said, more likely to push Goulding out wide with Patricia on the other wing

youd put roberts FB after last week

If last week highlighted one thing it is what i have been saying for the past 18 months....Wigans ONLY option at FB is Pat!

: Mon Feb 16, 2009 6:50 pm  

bazdev wrote:

I think Pryce might get a spot in the 17 this week along with Sam Tomkins. Ease Pryce in against a lesser side (If fit enough).

We all thought wakey were a lesser side with 8 missing and look what happend.

[JTB]

: Mon Feb 16, 2009 6:54 pm  

RB wrote: lol at the disciplinary review http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... php?id=705 Sounds like it's been written by a work experience kid with all the spelling mistakes. I like this one in the 'find a club near you' section: Shevington Sharks ARLFC St Johns Rugby College Wigan WN5 OLL

RB wrote: lol at the disciplinary review http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... php?id=705 Sounds like it's been written by a work experience kid with all the spelling mistakes. I like this one in the 'find a club near you' section: Shevington Sharks ARLFC St Johns Rugby College Wigan WN5 OLL

: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:07 pm  

Wilf George, there's a blast from the past

: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:17 pm  

If Roberts + Richards are both out, then maybe this was not a bad decision. Yes I know he isn't great, but who else can play full back? I wouldn't play Goulding there because he'd be more effective in the centre.

The only option I can see is Phelps at FB with Ainscough, Carmont, Goulding & Pryce in the backs.

: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:18 pm  

Captain13 wrote:

If that happens il shave my head with a tatty peeler!Roberts at FB again with carmont and Bailey as centres as you said, more likely to push Goulding out wide with Patricia on the other wing

Now, that I would pay to see !!!