NickyKiss wrote:
I thought they were but not through playing particularly well but more because we just didn’t perform at all in terms of our basics with the ball. They’ve had a lot of praise Huddersfield and I get it but they were so safety first and it ending up costing them. Watching the replay you would think we were scrambling all day long but we defended our stupid errors quite comfortably most of the time. Huddersfield were very workmanlike but I get the feeling if they could play the game again, they’d try and chance their arm a bit more. Turning the ball over on our line twice in that last 10 minutes, without even looking like they were thinking of scoring was something I think a Wigan or Saints would be getting heat for.
Oh they executed a very simple game plan, very well. Does that make them the better side tho?
Two crash over tries (well executed they may be) Vs us scoring two fantastic ones, or their lack of line breaks Vs 4/5 for us (in one half alone).
I think Cruncher pointed out that our match winning play had been tried a couple of times before. When it doesn't come off, then it's an error, but when it does come off - it's a match winning play etc. Fine lines and all depends on which way you wanna look at it.
Ultimately, one team went for it and tried to work the ball - yeah they coughed up possession off the back of it, but that's what won us the game in the end.