jinkin jimmy wrote:
All of this will ensure our medical staff will be even more stringent IMO. I'm happy to let them assess his fitness. If we can't trust our own staff who can we trust?
If we sign him its because NQC medical staff have decided his knees are not up to it.
He is by all accounts a bit of a legend at their club and they are doing all they can to
not push him out the door due to his injuries.
If under those circumstances he ends up going anyway that is a pretty spectacular medical disagreement over a players fitness.
Regarding his age I think he is ideal. Signing a 25 yr old would ruin our youngsters' prospects, signing anyone much younger is pointless ( we have those in abundance, it would seem).
It's rather hypothetical given I don't see any 25 year olds available but it is an interesting point. For one thing Hampshire is a half back IMO far more so than Sam but if there was a good 25 year old full back available it would be a dereliction of duty on the clubs part not to move for them IMO.
As a general point the idea we have to look after the interests of young players to the extent of signing 32 year old players while we wait to see if they make it is wrong-headed IMO. As it seems likely Sam is off we need a player
now not in a couple of years. Signing a quality player who would keep the likes of Tierney out would be another consequence of letting Sam go early and not being able to plan for the future properly but if one was available that would be good use of all this transfer money we will supposedly get. IMO you can't bet that future on unproven young players.