Re: Stains v Cas : Thu Sep 09, 2010 12:15 am  

JLM23 wrote:

Have I missed something? Or were you doing it as part of a Rugby League Report? The difference being someone who checks the disciplinary news is looking in general, not ringing a club to try and prove a point in an argument about a player you are clearly obsessed with? Did he run over you in the Junior sections, or ruin the 1st game you ever went to by scoring or something? It's clearly not healthy to be as obsessed with one person as you are with KC.

I am clearly NOT obsessed with Cunningham. What annoys me is how he's apparantly above the laws of the game. Radford throws a punch last weekend after provocation, gets a match ban (since overturned). Cunningham throws punches, causing injury, with NO provocation... doesn't even have to face the panel. It's a joke.

I hardly think he's going to be lost due to repeated Injury. If your so concerned maybe, he could be left out of the 4 Nations to have a rest?

I hoped to see him in action in a GB shirt, combining with Sam. But yes, to be honest, I think he should fully recover now, leave it to next year even.

However, I dont think you will agree with this idea as it doesn't negatively affect Saints.

Don't talk wet. I've got the best interests of the game at heart. I'd much rather Eastmond, a young CLEAN talent, was available without injury no matter who he played for as his presence is of benefit to the game as a whole.

As for better than Cunningham, I think its rather early to say. If he has half the influence and success that Kieron has had at Saints he'll do okay.

No, it's not too early to say at all. He IS better than Cunningham ever could be.

Re: Stains v Cas : Thu Sep 09, 2010 12:17 am  

FearTheVee wrote:

No response yet, I wouldn't have thought it would take so long to come up with a measly 5 incidents in 16 years for such a thuggish player.

Sorry, been rather busy having a life and all. I do hope that's ok with you.

Re: Stains v Cas : Thu Sep 09, 2010 8:07 am  

Fishsta wrote:

Sorry, been rather busy having a life and all. I do hope that's ok with you.

Yeah, ringing up SL clubs to check if Saints players have injured their players must take up a lot of time out of your "life"

Any more examples of KC thuggery yet? It's OK to admit you were wrong by the way.

Re: Stains v Cas : Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:12 am  

http://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics_player.php?hs1=2010&hp1=2501&hs2=2010&hp2=359&stat=tries&season=2010 So much of a thug that Tomkins has conceded more penalties? But don't let stats get in the way of your anti KC hate, Fishsta

http://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics_player.php?hs1=2010&hp1=2501&hs2=2010&hp2=359&stat=tries&season=2010 So much of a thug that Tomkins has conceded more penalties? But don't let stats get in the way of your anti KC hate, Fishsta

[JTB]

Re: Stains v Cas : Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:20 am  

Saint Ryan wrote: http://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics_player.php?hs1=2010&hp1=2501&hs2=2010&hp2=359&stat=tries&season=2010 So much of a thug that Tomkins has conceded more penalties? But don't let stats get in the way of your anti KC hate, Fishsta Doesn't KC play 40 minutes a match? Poor use of statistics to illustrate what's a pretty tedious argument anyway.

Saint Ryan wrote: http://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics_player.php?hs1=2010&hp1=2501&hs2=2010&hp2=359&stat=tries&season=2010 So much of a thug that Tomkins has conceded more penalties? But don't let stats get in the way of your anti KC hate, Fishsta Doesn't KC play 40 minutes a match? Poor use of statistics to illustrate what's a pretty tedious argument anyway.

Re: Stains v Cas : Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:28 am  

FearTheVee wrote:

Any more examples of KC thuggery yet? It's OK to admit you were wrong by the way.

I heard he stepped on a worm in training last week and didn't apologise. The git!

Re: Stains v Cas : Thu Sep 09, 2010 12:00 pm  

Saint Ryan wrote: http://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics_player.php?hs1=2010&hp1=2501&hs2=2010&hp2=359&stat=tries&season=2010 So much of a thug that Tomkins has conceded more penalties? But don't let stats get in the way of your anti KC hate, Fishsta JTB wrote: Doesn't KC play 40 minutes a match? Poor use of statistics to illustrate what's a pretty tedious argument anyway. So in SEVEN more appearances, Tomkins conceded TWO more penalties. And if Cunningham only plays 40 minutes a match, that means Sam's average of .66 of a penalty per match is a lot lower than Cunningham's 1.5 penalties per match! Add on how much he gets away with... deary me. FearTheVee wrote: Any more examples of KC thuggery yet? It's OK to admit you were wrong by the way. Cripes, online before school now. Like I said, there'll be plenty of examples this weekend.

Saint Ryan wrote: http://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics_player.php?hs1=2010&hp1=2501&hs2=2010&hp2=359&stat=tries&season=2010 So much of a thug that Tomkins has conceded more penalties? But don't let stats get in the way of your anti KC hate, Fishsta JTB wrote: Doesn't KC play 40 minutes a match? Poor use of statistics to illustrate what's a pretty tedious argument anyway. So in SEVEN more appearances, Tomkins conceded TWO more penalties. And if Cunningham only plays 40 minutes a match, that means Sam's average of .66 of a penalty per match is a lot lower than Cunningham's 1.5 penalties per match! Add on how much he gets away with... deary me. FearTheVee wrote: Any more examples of KC thuggery yet? It's OK to admit you were wrong by the way. Cripes, online before school now. Like I said, there'll be plenty of examples this weekend.

Re: Stains v Cas : Thu Sep 09, 2010 1:13 pm  

Fishsta wrote:

Like I said, there'll be plenty of examples this weekend.

So you come up with one incident in 16 years, for which no ban was given. What a thug.

What thuggish acts did he pull off in the televised game last weekend out of interest? I think I may have noticed him tread on someone's toe when he scored the winner, the cad.

Re: Stains v Cas : Thu Sep 09, 2010 1:22 pm  

FearTheVee wrote:

So you come up with one incident in 16 years, for which no ban was given. What a thug.

What thuggish acts did he pull off in the televised game last weekend out of interest? I think I may have noticed him tread on someone's toe when he scored the winner, the cad.

I agree.

KC is by no means whiter than white, but i would never describe him as a thug.

He is now worse than any other SL player. It is a ruff old game after all and sometimes a bit of intimidation is the order of the day.

Re: Stains v Cas : Thu Sep 09, 2010 8:11 pm  

Fishsta wrote:

I am clearly NOT obsessed with Cunningham. What annoys me is how he's apparantly above the laws of the game. Radford throws a punch last weekend after provocation, gets a match ban (since overturned). Cunningham throws punches, causing injury, with NO provocation... doesn't even have to face the panel. It's a joke.

I hoped to see him in action in a GB shirt, combining with Sam. But yes, to be honest, I think he should fully recover now, leave it to next year even.

Don't talk wet. I've got the best interests of the game at heart. I'd much rather Eastmond, a young CLEAN talent, was available without injury no matter who he played for as his presence is of benefit to the game as a whole.

No, it's not too early to say at all. He IS better than Cunningham ever could be.

You must really hate us don't you.