Re: Car damage : Sun Mar 15, 2009 5:58 pm  

kirkamania6 wrote:

Ok then

Still what your saying is stupid and pointless, your picking at minor things because you know that there is secure parking at the JJB and you were proven wrong so now you try to change it so that if everyone came individually in a car to try(which is ridiculous and I hope for your sake you know that too) and twist it so you become right when in fact you just make yourself look like a fool

I'm told there is secure parking for everyone at the JJB.

Is there secure parking for every car in every situation? A simple YES or NO will suffice, none of the above waffle.

The fact is no ground in the country has secure parking for everyone so to say the JJB does is lies.

Re: Car damage : Sun Mar 15, 2009 6:06 pm  

King Monkey wrote:

I'm told there is secure parking for everyone at the JJB.

Is there secure parking for every car in every situation? A simple YES or NO will suffice, none of the above waffle.

The fact is no ground in the country has secure parking for everyone so to say the JJB does is lies.

Ok if there was a capacity crowd and EVERYONE came individually in a car then no but if there was a capacity crowd and people made there way there as they usually do yes there is secure parking for everyone

Happy now?

Don't know why i'm even saying this because it wasn't me who said it in the first place

Re: Car damage : Sun Mar 15, 2009 6:08 pm  

kirkamania6 wrote:

Ok if there was a capacity crowd and EVERYONE came individually in a car then no

Thanks.

no further questioning necessary.

Re: Car damage : Sun Mar 15, 2009 6:10 pm  

King Monkey wrote:

Thanks.

no further questioning necessary.

Re: Car damage : Sun Mar 15, 2009 6:25 pm  

King Monkey wrote:

Thanks.

no further questioning necessary.

Who were you? And why did you need to change your username?

Re: Car damage : Sun Mar 15, 2009 7:21 pm  

King Monkey wrote:

No need to resort to abuse just because you've been proved wrong.

I was?

: Sun Mar 15, 2009 8:48 pm  

[quote="Crossgates Rhino"]Took you a while to come up with this little gem of information[/quot

You can call that a 13 1/2 shift where unfortunatly i can't access the internet. Next time i will make sure i infrom you of all the details before thinking about going to work. Get a life springs into mind. The same reason i am only just posting now is because i have been at work all day and have just arrived home. Hope this contains enough information for you about my whereabouts and time it takes me to post!

Re: Car damage : Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:15 pm  

King Monkey wrote:

I'm told there is secure parking for everyone at the JJB.

Is there secure parking for every car in every situation? A simple YES or NO will suffice, none of the above waffle.

The fact is no ground in the country has secure parking for everyone so to say the JJB does is lies.

Yes, there is. Not once have I known the official (and, as such, 'secure') parking to be 'full' at the JJB, and that includes GB games and even Latics-Man Utd title decider last season. The stadium might hold 25,000, but fact is only a fraction of that crowd will travel by car, and even then will car share. You're on to a loser here cocker.

Re: Car damage : Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:31 pm  

Leyther_Matt wrote:

Yes, there is. Not once have I known the official (and, as such, 'secure') parking to be 'full' at the JJB, and that includes GB games and even Latics-Man Utd title decider last season. The stadium might hold 25,000, but fact is only a fraction of that crowd will travel by car, and even then will car share. You're on to a loser here cocker.

I'm glad you agree that in certain scenarios there is not secure parking for EVERY fan in the ground.

Re: Car damage : Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:32 pm  

King Monkey wrote:

I'm glad you agree that in certain scenarios there is not secure parking for EVERY fan in the ground.

But there is. If everyone came in a mini bus then there is secure parking for every fan.