sergeant pepper wrote:
Are you just going to ignore what I'd posted, or are you just going to keep trotting out more BS?
1. I don't know, or care what he said and it doesn't matter to me or a hell of a lot of others too. You want proof on that? Check out the revenue for Fury when he fights. Boxing again in know, but 1.6m people bought Tyson's exhibition bout in 2020 & he's a convicted rapist, who also said he wanted to eat someone's kids.
2. I'm not making excuses for them. I just don't care one iota what they say, think or do outside of 80mins on a rugby pitch. Simple as that really. Not sure why you, as a grown man do either?
Once again however, as you don't seem to grasp this - Having the big names, actually playing the game is the BIGGEST benefit to the sport. Not charity work, not outreach in the community or schools, not taking a knee or even helping old ladies cross the road. Delivering an exciting product on the field should be the #1 goal for RL. Having players sat in the stand is detrimental to that.
Now if you want to talk about fines instead of bans, I'm all for it. Just don't f your product up by limiting your biggest assets.
Ok so let’s start at the natural place…
1. It matters to a lot of people, the fans who find certain words abhorrent, it matters to the players who chose to observe the 13 second equality stance prior to the game…and it matters to sponsors.
Picking out 2 global stars in 1 sport doesn’t prove you right. That is marketing.
Some sponsors will not touch either Tyson….boxing at the highest level can work with that, it isn’t an issue…huge money is involved in that sport at elite level, drop down only a few levels and see pro boxers struggling to make ends meat and see if they appreciate sponsors walking away.
2. You don’t cross certain lines. Simple as.
You definitely have never played the game if you do not get that.
You may not care, but others will.
Also it is against the rules hence why it is sanctioned.
Basically you are attempting to say it’s ok to go against the rules of the sport…just let them play regardless.
I care about it because of the effect it has on the sport, participation and sponsorship.
3. Fines instead of bans…so a player at a club with money and who is on a big wage can afford to break the rules….but others cannot.
Being relevant Israel Falou lost $14million in sponsorship over his comments.
Mason Greenwood?
Justin Thomas?
You are attempting to set a president that illegal play should be dealt with financially which will effect 0 change rather than an actual punishment.
All this is without considering the fact the sport has just tried to promote itself over the most inclusive World Cup in any sport.
Performance enhancing drugs are against the rules should we just issue fines for that?
You are an absolute clown.