Worse than Millward's team of 2006 or not? : Sat Feb 21, 2009 1:10 am  

Millward lost the first 2 games of 2006, but managed to win the third - is this current team, in your opinion, worse than that team or not?

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 1:10 am  

No.

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 1:12 am  

This team would knock Basil's team all over the shop.

[DaveO]

Re: Worse than Millward's team of 2006 or not? : Sat Feb 21, 2009 1:46 am  

saints35 bulls0 wrote:

Millward lost the first 2 games of 2006, but managed to win the third - is this current team, in your opinion, worse than that team or not?

The team isn't but the results are.

That should tell people something obvious.

Dave

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 2:19 am  

The team aren't worse.... Nobles tactics are.

In the second half when we dumped Nobles tactics we started to look promising and scored a couple of tries. Until he goes i feel that we will never take advantage of any attacking options in our squad.

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 2:26 am  

Yes...We dont have a team.Millward had the excuse of using Academy Players and he lost the plot, Noble just looks like a Girrafe.

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:44 am  

Babyface Finlayson wrote:

Yes...We dont have a team.Millward had the excuse of using Academy Players and he lost the plot, Noble just looks like a Girrafe. :wink:

Nah, everyone knows he looks just like a duck.

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:10 am  

Singe wrote:

Nah, everyone knows he looks just like a duck.

Bollards, he looks like a camel.

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:13 am  

In answer to the thread question: not even close, which makes it all the more laughable when people say this is the worst team they have ever seen. Some people really do have short memories.

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:16 am  

Yet in the 2006 season our crowds actually went up.
Two thousand off the gate last night was just the start of it. The fans are getting weary, IL must know this.

It's not the results thats keeping (most) fans away, it's the performances!