Just reading through this thread - there's so many points to comment on:
Wane -
1) How people still refer to him as one dimensional 'just get out there and bash 'em up' motivator staggers me. Everyone who's involved in him talk about attention to detail, culture, preparation. It may be possibly due to a few minutes of the behind the scenes program and now people think that's all he does.........?
2) In the last world cup we played some of the best attacking rugby i've seen in an England team - certainly since the days of Offiah playing. Yes, really disappointing semi final but it went to golden point and we lost following two consecutive mistakes in a format that makes winning very much a lucky dip.
Bringing a team together straight after the SL, players not played together, new half back pairing, playing against the biggest set of quality NRL proven forwards, in the wet with soft ground (unlike the NRL grounds when it rains hard) we're hardly likely to say 'just throw it around boys you'll be reet'. Smith has a great kicking game, takes the sting out of the forwards , play the game in their half etc, we used his strengths. SImple game plan for a bunch of players who only got together a week ago. In the 3rd, when we've had more time together, better conditions, we saw a much more dynamic and attacking attitude mixed with control when needed.
Seems to contradict the one- dimensional coach view.........
Newman comments:
Wane had mentioned Newman's poor discipline a few months ago and said he's not getting into the squad with that - he now gives credit to Leeds - which I take as they worked on his attitude and Wane seeing the improvement picked him for the squad. He's now had experience with NRL players and other top players - and like most people when you come into a higher performing group you learn from it and go back a better player. I can't see anything controversial in that ?
Squad Selection:
Injuries ruled many 1st choice out.
Mixture of experience and new - the stupid approach would be to play a team of international novices against a very good NRL based Tonga side, get thrashed, scar the new boys, they learn nothing and then they get dropped .....
He used the mid season game to introduce many more new faces - seems pretty smart to me?
Mixture of old heads who've been there, the younger players who came in learn from them in a winning , high performing envt - again sounds like a good approach. Debuts to a number of players. Only selection and decision making i would query was Faz.
Really don't understand the criticism over this series - sure we all want to see more of the 3rd game style, but surely people can see why that's not always possible especially when you come up against quality opposition that don't just sit back and watch you throw the ball around and admire.