: Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:00 pm  

There's been enough warnings. You're gone.

JTB

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:01 pm  

NickyKiss wrote:

How does a 'B' sample work though?

Surely they won't say to him now 'we're testing you again' as surely even Hock wouldn't be thaty daft to still be taking it!

I presume both samples will have been taken at the same time(after the salford game)?

You mickey into a bottle labeled "A" and a bottle labeled "B". A gets tested immediately, B gets frozen. If A comes back positive, B comes out the freezer and gets tested.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:02 pm  

Wire girl wrote:

Please don't quote idiotic comments

Very poor effort flower.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:02 pm  

Bill_Barlow wrote:

Hasnt he got a kid? Im sure if hes found guilty hes going to have to find a source of income.

If he is positive and the B sample confirme then if you live by the sword then theresult is obvious.

A talented sportsman who is looked upon by kids does this well I have no sympathy.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:02 pm  

Paul2e wrote:

So will the club sack him, or allow him to remain training with the team on an unpaid basis.

Everybody deserves a 2nd chance(or 3rd in Hocks case if the old rumour was true) so people say so maybe the club will stand by him to a point.

The only way i'd want the club to offer him any sort of future would be if he agreed to go on some sort of rehibilitation course and agreed to be tested by the club on a random basis for the rest of his career(after his ban).

Unless he could prove he's totally clear of it i'd sack him and wouldn't offer him any route back and nor should any other club.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:03 pm  

Connor The Warrior wrote:

Is this not the second time Hock has been found guilty of drugs offence?

I seem to remember him being caught before.

Could be wrong.

No, first time.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:03 pm  

You too.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:04 pm  

Mark wrote:

Would that be the player who you used to accuse but probably won't now seeing as he plays for you.

Only trying to lighten the mood, I hope it turns out to be a mistake as he's a great talent and will be a huge loss for Wigan and English rugby league.

Yeah the exact one plus a few more

I know your only having a laugh but it's a bit too soon and i aint just gutted cause he plays for us like you said that is one bullet less for the aussies plus the fact he's 'so called' had a few close shaves before

My thinking at the moment if brains where dynamite he wouldn't have enough to blow his hat off

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:05 pm  

best new poster wrote:

No

way hey!!!



d1ck

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:07 pm  

Well it sorts aids our recruitment of an enforcer prop now. We only need to look at a player capable of giving us 2 good seasons with Hock coming back to the club in 2012 as our enforcer Prop replacement.

May not be ideal but i will put money on it happening.