Re: SC : Mon Oct 05, 2020 9:17 am  

jbuzza wrote:

They are looking for someone to help with social media though probably needs someone with a more positive outlook.

Who is/are ‘they’?

Re: SC : Mon Oct 05, 2020 9:36 am  

wire-quin wrote:

Who is/are ‘they’?

SC

Re: SC : Mon Oct 05, 2020 12:07 pm  

I understood that Social Media was one of the areas of expertise, one of the committee of the SC.
Perhaps they are too busy .

Re: SC : Mon Oct 05, 2020 12:33 pm  

Victor wrote:

I understood that Social Media was one of the areas of expertise, one of the committee of the SC.
Perhaps they are too busy .

Maybe they are not positive enough

Re: SC : Mon Oct 05, 2020 12:48 pm  

Or sober.

Re: SC : Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:08 pm  

Am I aloud to ask what the SC have been up to or is that information exclusive to the inner sanctum?

Re: SC : Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:25 pm  

wire-quin wrote:

Am I aloud to ask what the SC have been up to or is that information exclusive to the inner sanctum?

Doubt it.

Re: SC : Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:49 pm  

WQ, I think that you are right.. We are not worthy.

Re: SC : Thu Dec 31, 2020 5:02 pm  

Not a happy ship the SC. It appears it is not delivering on what it promised. Some long standing fans are not happy.
The lottery too is peeing a few people off.
Not good end to the year for the SC.

Re: SC : Thu Dec 31, 2020 5:15 pm  

whats the issue??