SCULLY SPILLS THE BEANS : Fri May 29, 2009 3:49 pm  

In the Examiner scully explains how Trin did not use his strengths and that he is motivated by what Brown has said to him.

Paying a guy close on £90K and then not using him properly. They must have money to burn.

I hope the 'sudden disappearance' of Richard Moore does not mean he will be on his way to the Giants.

What is it with wakey and props?

Re: SCULLY SPILLS THE BEANS : Fri May 29, 2009 3:52 pm  

Marsdengiant wrote:

In the Examiner scully explains how Trin did not use his strengths and that he is motivated by what Brown has said to him.

Paying a guy close on £90K and then not using him properly. They must have money to burn.

I hope the 'sudden disappearance' of Richard Moore does not mean he will be on his way to the Giants.

What is it with wakey and props?

Make your mind up!!!!

Re: SCULLY SPILLS THE BEANS : Fri May 29, 2009 3:55 pm  

SimonBarrett wrote:

Make your mind up!!!!

Gosh if they don't have much £ then wasting £90K is terrible mismanagement (I think i saw a thread on the VT that made this point)

: Fri May 29, 2009 3:58 pm  

Maybe John Keer asked him to play differently as it suited their style? Someone being paid should a high salary should be able to adapt their gameplay.

: Fri May 29, 2009 3:58 pm  

I wouldn't mind Moore. He always has a good game against us.

: Fri May 29, 2009 4:01 pm  

I also think he's a bit silly going to press with comments like that - they are still paying his wages after all - although the article leads me to think otherwise.

: Fri May 29, 2009 4:06 pm  

Ivor C&G Scarf wrote:

I wouldn't mind Moore. He always has a good game against us.

I think his defence around the ruck is a joke after 10 mins on the field. At this stage he is reddening. By 15 mins he is purple and my gran could skip by him.

[ For info my Gran is in here 70s and has had a hip replacement!]

: Fri May 29, 2009 4:09 pm  

Wadski wrote:

Maybe John Keer asked him to play differently as it suited their style? Someone being paid should a high salary should be able to adapt their gameplay.

Why sign a player with distictive skills - virtually unique for a SL British prop - and then want him to play differently?

: Fri May 29, 2009 4:11 pm  

Wadski wrote:

I also think he's a bit silly going to press with comments like that - they are still paying his wages after all - although the article leads me to think otherwise.

If they have the £ available it would be benficial , financially, to both parties to pay up the rmainder of his contract in a lump sum.

: Fri May 29, 2009 5:02 pm  

Wadski wrote:

- although the article leads me to think otherwise.

ladies and gentlemen we have a winner