: Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:12 am  

chissitt wrote:

:shock: you must be in a good mood. A paragraph and not one word of abuse well done darnil.

You keep getting confused with abuse and observation. I merely make observations on what gets posted. I call a spade a spade is all. A word is a word. If I wanted to I could use a thousand words to describe things, but I have neither the time or the inclination to do that with folk like yourself.

So you're just going to have to forgive me if I use the odd word here and there that you find offensive. Considering what an offensive little skamp you are, I think that's fair enough!

: Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:36 am  

GIANT DAZ wrote:

why OUR crowd was so low ??

didnt wakey get just over 5,000 for our visit the other week for a local derby league match ?
tell me what was the attendance when you played a fairly well supported wigan side in the cup ? ah yes - 4,883.

Don't forget they had a ticket offer for that game too - buy a league ticket and get a CC ticket free for both Wigan and Wakie fans.

: Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:46 am  

Wadski wrote:

I used Wakie in there as you are, I believe a Wakie fan and since there are currently Wakie, Cas and Hull KRs visiting I thought I would include them. I didn't do it for every club as I wanted to save some time since I have work to do today. I will try to get back to you on it though.

I don't remember the half prince home shirt, is that an offer you got at Wakie?

I have just realised I missed Hull KRs CC game off it.

Please do not put it on on my account.

The half priced Wakey shirt you allude to is a contradiction in terms as far as you are concerned surely. By your own admission we are penniless a thought shared by a number of your fans on here, that been the case how on earth are we able to sell them at half price

You still did not answer my question re attendances last season, are the reasons' embarrassing or is it you just dont have the facts to hand

I sympathise with you being in an office working in this weather. If I might just ask a favour of you, could you find yound Darnil something to do if only to keep him out of trouble

: Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:54 am  

GIANT DAZ wrote:

why OUR crowd was so low ??

didnt wakey get just over 5,000 for our visit the other week for a local derby league match ?
tell me what was the attendance when you played a fairly well supported wigan side in the cup ? ah yes - 4,883.

Hold on there fellah, If you cannot respond to the thread with a reasoned reply. Then dont cloud the issue by making comparisons with Wakefield. My post did not mention Wakey at all, it was a response to a question about the attendance re- Hudds v Cas. If you want to join in then you must learn to keep up read my reply to Wadski.

: Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:59 am  

Last seasons average attendance at the Galpharm was discussed quite frequently actually. Do you know what last seasons average attendace was at the Galpharm?

7,846.

How was yours? Would you like me to tell you?

6,962.

You really do have some trouble with the English language, don't you. It seems to be fine for you to come and troll but then you get your moobs out when some facts that you find less salient are highlighted. You post factually incorrect insinuations and then start wailing when the facts get posted that make you look stupid.

Tip: Check your facts before posting, that way you don't look like an idiot.

: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:04 am  

YTD average for Wakey: 5,667. A drop of ~19%

And you're here poking our crowds? Don't you think you have other crowd figures, ie. yours, to be worrying about right now?

: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:08 am  

chissitt wrote:

The half priced Wakey shirt you allude to is a contradiction in terms as far as you are concerned surely. By your own admission we are penniless a thought shared by a number of your fans on here, that been the case how on earth are we able to sell them at half price

supply and demand. No demand so reduce prices. Simple economics really.

You still did not answer my question re attendances last season, are the reasons' embarrassing or is it you just dont have the facts to hand

What question - I missed it. Please can you post it again.

I sympathise with you being in an office working in this weather. If I might just ask a favour of you, could you find yound Darnil something to do if only to keep him out of trouble

You confuse me - you lead me to believe Danril was a young child who required an afternoon nap, now you say he should be working. H&SE would have a field day bringing a child into this office.

: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:16 am  

Danril wrote:

You keep getting confused with abuse and observation. I merely make observations on what gets posted. I call an idiot an idiot thats all. A word is a word. If I wanted to I could use a thousand words to abuse you, but I have neither the time nor the education to do that with folk like yourself.

So you're just going to have to forgive me if I use the odd word of abuse here and there that you find amusing. Considering what an inoffensive little skamp you are, I think that's fair enough!

Edited for accuracy.

The only person on here what gets confused is your good self.you spew that much vitriol out at anybody what dares to offer an opinion that doesnt concur with you, its little wonder you do not choke on your own bile. Alas old boy my thoughts are that you are basically out of your deapth on here. mmm having said that I think you would be out of your depth in a car park puddle

: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:21 am  

See, this is the hyprocrisy of it all. You cry and wail about abuse and then come out with that shpeel yourself.

I said I call a spade a spade, you've edited that to say I call an idiot an idiot. Why edit it? The meaning remains the same, if the word 'idiot' is offensive to you then there's only one reason for that.

You bandy about the abuse, you sneer from the imaginary high horse about our crowds, you cry when you are rightly described as an idiot and then infer that anyone other than you is out of your depth.

I'm not offering opinions here. I'm telling you facts. Recent facts discussed include your crowds, inferior to ours and dropping like a lead balloon. Yet you're poking at ours! And I'm out of my depth, you say!

Hoik!

: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:27 am  

Danril wrote:

You really do have some trouble with the English language, don't you. It seems to be fine for you to come and troll but then you get your moobs out when some facts that you find less salient are highlighted. You post factually incorrect insinuations and then start wailing when the facts get posted that make you look stupid.

Most people have little or no problem at all understanding my English, those with an education that is. As far as you are concerned then I can see the problem. Let me give you a tip learn to do joined up writing then you will not be sole reliant on your kid's pc.

And just as a matter of interest what are my moobsI hope you are not getting personal young man