: Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:35 pm  

up and over wrote:

I try my best.

Said my piece, good luck in the semi's but think saints might just be too strong.

Thanks for your, errrrr opinion

And we'll see

: Tue Jun 02, 2009 7:58 am  

GIANT DAZ wrote:

ah so were using a televised all pay cup match to judge our crowds on now are we ?so lets use it for you - 7,400 for your game with 1500 warrington fans +5,900 hull kr fans , now that is pi55 poor after all the noise you lot make.

Maybe thats why your attendance was so low then. Boosted only by a very good turn out by the Tigers who have to pay top dollar home and away.

: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:00 am  

Danril wrote:

Do you know what our average attendance is?

Ask him one on music.

: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:22 am  

chissitt wrote:

Maybe thats why your attendance was so low then. Boosted only by a very good turn out by the Tigers who have to pay top dollar home and away.

TV games at home for Giants this year:
Vs Hull FC : 10,459
Vs Leeds : 11,593
Vs Castleford : 6,359
Average: 9470

TV games at home for Hull KR this year:
Vs Leeds : 8,623
Average: 8,623

TV games at home for Wakefield this year:
Vs Warrington: 5,159
Vs Saints : 6,038
Vs Bradford: 6,516
Average: 5,904

TV games at home for Castleford this year:
Vs Huddersfield : 6,572
Average : 6,572


Don't let the facts get in the way of a good argument.

: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:33 am  

Seeing as there are so many Wakey 'fans' on here at the moment perhaps we should have a thread about them, discussing how pathetic and worthless they are. We could also possibly discuss their falling crowds, duelling players and pipe dream facilities. Or perhaps just cut to the chase and start planning the celebrations for when they get kicked out of SL.

: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:53 am  

Danril wrote:

Seeing as there are so many Wakey 'fans' on here at the moment perhaps we should have a thread about them, discussing how pathetic and worthless they are. We could also possibly discuss their falling crowds, duelling players and pipe dream facilities. Or perhaps just cut to the chase and start planning the celebrations for when they get kicked out of SL.

You are not allowed. You get called names, get abused via PM, get told that you are wrong even though they are the facts, get told you have made it up even in the face of the evidence and generally abused. Then there are the nice ones like Mutley Cat and chissitt who actually can string a sentence together.

: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:53 am  

Wadski wrote:

TV games at home for Giants this year:
Vs Hull FC : 10,459
Vs Leeds : 11,593
Vs Castleford : 6,359
Average: 9470

TV games at home for Hull KR this year:
Vs Leeds : 8,623
Average: 8,623

TV games at home for Wakefield this year:
Vs Warrington: 5,159
Vs Saints : 6,038
Vs Bradford: 6,516
Average: 5,904

TV games at home for Castleford this year:
Vs Huddersfield : 6,572
Average : 6,572


Don't let the facts get in the way of a good argument

Not sure what your point is! I commented on the fact that your crowd in the semi was poor perhaps because your fans would not have got in at the reduced rate you normally would have, and the fact it was as high as it was imo was because of the good following of Cas fans. Once again you have brought Wakefield into your argument. Why is it that some of your fans cannot have a debate without using Wakefield as a comparison. It is interesting to note that until uncle Ken's earth shattering announcement about next to nothing priced season tickets providing you bought a half priced replica shirt that last season nobody on here wanted to discuss attendances'. Dont just use KR to confuse things I am sure you have stats' on all the other clubs' as well, Why not put a few of those up as well.

: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:57 am  

Danril wrote:

Seeing as there are so many Wakey 'fans' on here at the moment perhaps we should have a thread about them, discussing how pathetic and worthless they are. We could also possibly discuss their falling crowds, duelling players and pipe dream facilities. Or perhaps just cut to the chase and start planning the celebrations for when they get kicked out of SL.

you must be in a good mood. A paragraph and not one word of abuse well done darnil.

: Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:00 am  

chissitt wrote:

Not sure what your point is! I commented on the fact that your crowd in the semi was poor perhaps because your fans would not have got in at the reduced rate you normally would have, and the fact it was as high as it was imo was because of the good following of Cas fans. Once again you have brought Wakefield into your argument. Why is it that some of your fans cannot have a debate without using Wakefield as a comparison. It is interesting to note that until uncle Ken's earth shattering announcement about next to nothing priced season tickets providing you bought a half priced replica shirt that last season nobody on here wanted to discuss attendances'. Dont just use KR to confuse things I am sure you have stats' on all the other clubs' as well, Why not put a few of those up as well.

I used Wakie in there as you are, I believe a Wakie fan and since there are currently Wakie, Cas and Hull KRs visiting I thought I would include them. I didn't do it for every club as I wanted to save some time since I have work to do today. I will try to get back to you on it though.

I don't remember the half prince home shirt, is that an offer you got at Wakie?

I have just realised I missed Hull KRs CC game off it.

: Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:01 am  

chissitt wrote:

Maybe thats why your attendance was so low then. Boosted only by a very good turn out by the Tigers who have to pay top dollar home and away.

why OUR crowd was so low ??

didnt wakey get just over 5,000 for our visit the other week for a local derby league match ?
tell me what was the attendance when you played a fairly well supported wigan side in the cup ? ah yes - 4,883.