: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:35 pm  

RB wrote:

He didn't land any.

None of the headbutts connected? I imagine that's because he was blindfolded to give Griffin a chance. Sooner or later one would've hit the target.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:43 pm  

Baron Greenback wrote:

None of the headbutts connected? I imagine that's because he was blindfolded to give Griffin a chance. Sooner or later one would've hit the target.

I read somewhere that if you have an infinite number of Griffs swinging an infinite number of punches at an infinite number of Hansens...one will eventually land.

You can't argue with that...that's scientific fact!

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:17 pm  

Regardless of how much you want to cry about it, the RFL has only seen what Mason did as punishable. If the RFL thought Hanson took Moore off the ball and O'Loughlin was holding players so that Hansen could hit them ( ) then they would have recieved bans too.

But of course, ''The RFL is bias'', ''It would never happen to Wigan'' etc etc etc.

Seriously, get over it. It's over.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:42 pm  

Alex BP' wrote:

If the RFL thought Hanson took Moore off the ball and O'Loughlin was holding players so that Hansen could hit them ( ) then they would have recieved bans too.

Erm, no. Not necessarily. In the real World, it's possible that they thought Hansen did take Moore off the ball but didn't think the challenge was worthy of a ban.

Despite your eyes seeing Hansen moonwalk down the pitch and Moore running into him, he had plenty of time to pull out of the challenge. I don't think he raised the elbow, but he definitely charged Moore late. Would I ban him for it? No.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:32 pm  

Alex BP' wrote:

Regardless of how much you want to cry about it, the RFL has only seen what Mason did as punishable. If the RFL thought Hanson took Moore off the ball and O'Loughlin was holding players so that Hansen could hit them ( ) then they would have recieved bans too.

But of course, ''The RFL is bias'', ''It would never happen to Wigan'' etc etc etc.

Seriously, get over it. It's over.

We won and are 3rd. I'm chuffed sweetie.

Why should I be upset? I am happy for NB to rotate our props. Jacko is an excellent replacement. And there are at least 2 other capable props. Mason has been working hard so a couple of weeks off may give him a freshener.Next time Hansen wants to do a little head hunting against the Giants he will know his head is fair game. Love it

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:53 pm  

Robbo and Griffin, no charges
Mason charged with striking, l think if guilty its 1-4

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:59 pm  

boomer wrote:

Robbo and Griffin, no charges
Mason charged with striking, l think if guilty its 1-4

Already on PG 2 bud.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:07 pm  

Baron Greenback wrote:

Erm, no. Not necessarily. In the real World, it's possible that they thought Hansen did take Moore off the ball but didn't think the challenge was worthy of a ban.

Despite your eyes seeing Hansen moonwalk down the pitch and Moore running into him, he had plenty of time to pull out of the challenge. I don't think he raised the elbow, but he definitely charged Moore late. Would I ban him for it? No.

PMSL

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:44 pm  

Alex BP' wrote: It's clear that Hansen didn't elbow anybody, I've not a clue where you have got that from. You'll see clearly on the replay that Moore runs into the back of Hansen. In regards to O'Loughlin ''holding somebody so that Hansen can punch them''...Are you being serious? You've been watching too much WWE. O'Loughlin simply went in to break the fight up which again, is clear on the video replay. Get over it. Huddersfield Examiner wrote: Star hooker Scott Moore had been an initial concern after the Wigan game when he was caught late and high by Harrison Hansen. But Brown fully expects him to be involved against Quins. "He couldn’t remember too much about the game when he came off," added Brown. "But I would be very surprised if he doesn’t turn up for training today as bubbly as ever." [Link is to Huddersfield Examiner.]

Alex BP' wrote: It's clear that Hansen didn't elbow anybody, I've not a clue where you have got that from. You'll see clearly on the replay that Moore runs into the back of Hansen. In regards to O'Loughlin ''holding somebody so that Hansen can punch them''...Are you being serious? You've been watching too much WWE. O'Loughlin simply went in to break the fight up which again, is clear on the video replay. Get over it. Huddersfield Examiner wrote: Star hooker Scott Moore had been an initial concern after the Wigan game when he was caught late and high by Harrison Hansen. But Brown fully expects him to be involved against Quins. "He couldn’t remember too much about the game when he came off," added Brown. "But I would be very surprised if he doesn’t turn up for training today as bubbly as ever." [Link is to Huddersfield Examiner.]

: Tue Mar 31, 2009 2:43 am  

Danril wrote:

Wild?

He was bloody furious!!