: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:05 am  

Mutts wrote:

your implying what im implying with that in mind i can not uphold your request . What is clear is that this as nothing to do with KR players found guilty of assault nor does it bare any relevance to men who attack people in a taxi queue its about a player being cited for dirty play from a club where according to many coaches its a common tactic.

i don't really care one way or another if hudders are dirty i think due to Griff's impeccable record both on and off the field he will be safe at red hall , strange though that now its not only the SL coaches or the players or the fans but now the RFL seems to think that a problem exists in huddersfield's tackling technique.

You are not withdrawing your allegation that I have been violent. So be it.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:05 am  

Danril wrote:

In your own tiny little mind you may think whatever you like. Post sh*t on here and it'll get marked down as sh*t.

Better to leave it in your mind, oik.

Honest to God, you don't have the capacity to play these games. Not even close.

any way back on top topic do you think griffin deserves a ban?

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:08 am  

Marsdengiant wrote:

You are not withdrawing your allegation that I have been violent. So be it.

you implied that i implied that if that's how you wanna read it so be it , back on topic without mentioning any KR player do you think Griff deserves a ban

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:11 am  

Read the thread. You should find ~4 posts back where I clearly state I think he'll probably get a game for it.

For me to think that it means I think he's guilty of a grapple and he deserves to be banned for a game.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:14 am  

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:17 am  

Mutts wrote:

any way back on top topic do you think griffin deserves a ban?

yes.
if he is found guilty by the powers that be, but it looks pretty conclusive

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:17 am  

Mutts, leave of the personal attacks or push off. Theres a deluded chap.

As for Griffin, he wasnt the only one penalised for a grapple tackle on Friday night, so whether he deserves a ban is up to the RFL, I'd say not.

And out of interest, what are the stats for players of other clubs called up for similar offences?

Our fairplay index looks ok, in fact better than well over half the league

Or is it that you simply have a sad vendetta against a former Wakefield player who went on to better things?

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:18 am  

Danril wrote:

In your own tiny little mind you may think whatever you like. Post sh*t on here and it'll get marked down as sh*t.

Better to leave it in your mind, oik.

Honest to God, you don't have the capacity to play these games. Not even close.

I think Mutts is clutching at straws. he's not very bright and 'supports' a club like wakey. Life at wakey is so dreadful that his highlight is an ex wakey player being up on a charge - how bleak it must be for poor mutts.

See it his way danril. Doing well on the field yet gates plummetting. The Thorne Park debacle, the pretence of a new stadium (for a team fewer fans want to watch), players being publicly suspended , alledged fights between players, the press reporting key players being offered around, oz reserve grade player flown in etc. Plus 'share offers' that smack of desperation.

Add to this the embarrassment of a 'team building' beard growing scheme where the head coach says on tv that he is 'dropping' out rather than wait for the 20 points to be achieved.

Can you blalme poor old Mutts that the highlight of his season is Griff up on a charge

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:20 am  

Mutts wrote:

you implied that i implied that if that's how you wanna read it so be it , back on topic without mentioning any KR player do you think Griff deserves a ban

You are either dishonest or incapable of writing coherently. You lack the integrity to clarify what you have stated.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:21 am  

you see , you get away with murder .



btw thanks for the answer as you had just previously only stated your presumption of sentence.