Re: Rangi Chase : Mon Nov 02, 2015 10:35 am  

wolrab613 wrote: According to LE chase wont be coming to leigh. For the salary cap, and interest from others. Why announce on the radio he would sign? Why allow a promising young british hb go on loan to dewsbury? Which would leave us with no cover at all, for Ridyard and Brierley, if Chase isn't coming. I think we actually announced to the media, that he HAD signed. Here's just one newspaper that announced it. http://www.express.co.uk/sport/rugbylea ... om-Salford

wolrab613 wrote: According to LE chase wont be coming to leigh. For the salary cap, and interest from others. Why announce on the radio he would sign? Why allow a promising young british hb go on loan to dewsbury? Which would leave us with no cover at all, for Ridyard and Brierley, if Chase isn't coming. I think we actually announced to the media, that he HAD signed. Here's just one newspaper that announced it. http://www.express.co.uk/sport/rugbylea ... om-Salford

Re: Rangi Chase : Mon Nov 02, 2015 10:59 am  

Alan wrote: Which would leave us with no cover at all, for Ridyard and Brierley, if Chase isn't coming. I think we actually announced to the media, that he HAD signed. Here's just one newspaper that announced it. http://www.express.co.uk/sport/rugbylea ... om-Salford can Reynolds not be brought back?

Alan wrote: Which would leave us with no cover at all, for Ridyard and Brierley, if Chase isn't coming. I think we actually announced to the media, that he HAD signed. Here's just one newspaper that announced it. http://www.express.co.uk/sport/rugbylea ... om-Salford can Reynolds not be brought back?

Re: Rangi Chase : Mon Nov 02, 2015 11:43 am  

Alan wrote: Which would leave us with no cover at all, for Ridyard and Brierley, if Chase isn't coming. I think we actually announced to the media, that he HAD signed. Here's just one newspaper that announced it. http://www.express.co.uk/sport/rugbylea ... -Salitford It certainly doesn't look good or professional to announce the signing of a player ,we have not actually signed.

Alan wrote: Which would leave us with no cover at all, for Ridyard and Brierley, if Chase isn't coming. I think we actually announced to the media, that he HAD signed. Here's just one newspaper that announced it. http://www.express.co.uk/sport/rugbylea ... -Salitford It certainly doesn't look good or professional to announce the signing of a player ,we have not actually signed.

Re: Rangi Chase : Mon Nov 02, 2015 11:57 am  

charlie caroli wrote:

It certainly doesn't look good or professional to announce the signing of a player ,we have not actually signed.

I don't think any club would announce the signing of a player without a signature.

Re: Rangi Chase : Mon Nov 02, 2015 12:34 pm  

propforward 2338 wrote:

can Reynolds not be brought back?

Probably, but I am sure Dewsbury would want some form of compensation as they have possibly missed out on halves they could have signed. With the loan being arranged they would have dipped out of the market for HBs

Re: Rangi Chase : Mon Nov 02, 2015 1:15 pm  

atomic wrote:

I don't think any club would announce the signing of a player without a signature.

While Leigh Centurions as a Club never officially announced the signing of Rangi ,didn't Derek say on GMR after the Widnes game we HAD signed him?

Re: Rangi Chase : Mon Nov 02, 2015 1:55 pm  

The most likely scenario which fits is the "he has signed a contract but it is dependent on the RFL registering it" scenario. Which is where the discussions with the RFL come into play.

Re: Rangi Chase : Mon Nov 02, 2015 2:21 pm  

That is the most unlikely scenario based on Derek's interview in the rugby papers

Re: Rangi Chase : Mon Nov 02, 2015 2:42 pm  

I have been told Ryan Hampshire is back on the cards.

Interesting if true because on his day, he would be unstoppable in the Championship.

Re: Rangi Chase : Mon Nov 02, 2015 3:42 pm  

Thought he was off to Cas