knock ons : Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:00 pm  

runsomemore wrote:

If we cut out the stupid penalties out that we so easily give away we would have won alot more comfortable. I can remember only one try the {interception } that did not come off the back of our penalties. We even gave a penalty away for dissent when we were on attack in thier ten metres. With three tackle left.

what about the the knock on he gave near end of the game the guy was all over chris hills back , at least i think it was him !now that should have been a penalty to leigh we could have lost the game on the back of that

Re: knock ons : Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:09 pm  

itsatry! wrote:

what about the the knock on he gave near end of the game the guy was all over chris hills back , at least i think it was him !now that should have been a penalty to leigh we could have lost the game on the back of that

I thought it was Maden but my thoughts too about the knock on decision.

Re: knock ons : Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:19 pm  

frankb wrote:

I thought it was Maden but my thoughts too about the knock on decision.

from where we where sat it could have been anybody

: Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:29 pm  

It's like watching a game from the moon isnt it?

Re: knock ons : Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:33 pm  

itsatry! wrote:

what about the the knock on he gave near end of the game the guy was all over chris hills back , at least i think it was him !now that should have been a penalty to leigh we could have lost the game on the back of that

One decision out of many. Dont think the ref had a good game either. But we did not help ourselfs.

Re: knock ons : Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:57 pm  

runsomemore wrote:

One decision out of many. Dont think the ref had a good game either. But we did not help ourselfs.

We certainly didnt,we let ourselves down this week like as been said we will not win matches giving silly penalties away.