Re: Rowley : Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:01 pm  

halifaxjohn wrote:

I thought you and Ian went back a long way.
He is far more loyal to you than you to him.

Sorry John ,I don't understand that post.
Could you explain in more detail?

Re: Rowley : Mon Feb 29, 2016 8:19 am  

Budgiezilla wrote:

Charlie (Ian) is a good friend of mine and when I asked him about it, he told me is definitely not Mr Jagger. He has told me 'lots of stuff' in his time, and if he was using that user name, he WOULD have told me, believe you me.

I have met Ian many times and oft had a pint with the fella.
He comes across as a top bloke who I'm happy to have a pot with and put the world to rights.
I accept I'm out of my jurisdiction on here.... but this forum is nonthebetter for his absence.

Re: Rowley : Mon Feb 29, 2016 10:32 am  

Rotherham Fev Fan wrote:

I have met Ian many times and oft had a pint with the fella.
He comes across as a top bloke who I'm happy to have a pot with and put the world to rights.
I accept I'm out of my jurisdiction on here.... but this forum is nonthebetter for his absence.

He probably felt he had no choice seen as though very few people seemed to be backing him up and even a couple of mods insinuated that he were Jagger. In hindsight though stopping posting was probably a bad choice as people have taken it as an admission of guilt and the mods seem loathe to put an end to the speculation.

Re: Rowley : Mon Feb 29, 2016 10:53 am  

Sorry but who cares it's a rugby forum for Christ sake!

Re: Rowley : Mon Feb 29, 2016 10:59 am  

If you're turning on people who refer to themselves in the third person then you should go after The Watcher next.

Re: Rowley : Mon Feb 29, 2016 1:50 pm  

Rotherham Fev Fan wrote:

I have met Ian many times and oft had a pint with the fella.
He comes across as a top bloke who I'm happy to have a pot with and put the world to rights.
I accept I'm out of my jurisdiction on here.... but this forum is nonthebetter for his absence.

I agree, I'm missing him already.

Not sure about the Jagger thing, guess it must have been Charlie but who really cares.

Re: Rowley : Mon Feb 29, 2016 1:56 pm  

Come back in Charlie and have a brew!

[mish]

Re: Rowley : Mon Feb 29, 2016 4:21 pm  

Greg Florimos Boots wrote:

He probably felt he had no choice seen as though very few people seemed to be backing him up and even a couple of mods insinuated that he were Jagger. In hindsight though stopping posting was probably a bad choice as people have taken it as an admission of guilt and the mods seem loathe to put an end to the speculation.

Just for the record, I wasn't one of the mods who insinuated that he was - for the simple reason that I don't know (as I explained earlier).

I don't know whether the site mods would know for sure but I know that neither myself nor DJ, as forum mods, have enough information to say for sure either way.