Re: More good news for Leigh (NOT !!!) : Fri Sep 28, 2018 7:59 pm  

Harold Rigby Jnr wrote:

It is a two way process. The players in return for being handsomely paid ( and you do know Leigh players were paid well over the going rate) are then expected to at least deliver on the field.

Players have to also accept some responsibility surely.

Whilst I agree wholeheartedly H, I'm not sure of many lines of business whereby you can reduce the wage of people on agreed contracts without due process, and I'm not sure the club took that route

Re: More good news for Leigh (NOT !!!) : Sat Sep 29, 2018 11:53 pm  

Binosh wrote:

Why do people keep talking about the players like its ALL their fault?

The players do what they always do, if Leigh offer a contract of employment based on researching a player (watching videos, ringing agents & contacts within the game)then that is upto the club. Its not the players fault.

Yes and the definition being mismanagement,something most have all seen previously and are still seeing it again.

Re: More good news for Leigh (NOT !!!) : Sun Sep 30, 2018 7:35 am  

atomic wrote:

Yes and the definition being mismanagement,something most have all seen previously and are still seeing it again.

Boring

Re: More good news for Leigh (NOT !!!) : Sun Sep 30, 2018 12:16 pm  

Just because Leigh paid £150k salary doesn't mean the player all of a sudden becomes better, it means you have an overpaid player not living up to over-inflated expectations. Leigh had to pay overinflated wages to attract players, something Toronto are doing as well.

The difference between Leigh & Toronto is the quality of the rest of the squad, their average players are much better than our average players and they also know the championship inside out as most of them came from Leigh.

Vai Vai & Lovett were the most ridiculous use of salary cap I have ever encountered. Warrington Laughing at how much we offered Evans, we threw money away.