Re: Referring AGAIN : Sun May 07, 2017 10:22 am  

GUBRATS wrote:

Fafita was leaning on him , that's a penalty

Was it balls, Acton tried to play the ball whilst on his knees. Fafita may have been leaning on, but it's an art that we don't seem to be able to suss I.e when to release

Re: Referring AGAIN : Sun May 07, 2017 10:24 am  

GUBRATS wrote:

Fafita was leaning on him , that's a penalty

But 4 ft and 20 meters is a bit of a difference so shows u exaggerate things to favour your team

Re: Referring AGAIN : Sun May 07, 2017 10:29 am  

dboy wrote:

Impeding the 20 restart is a professional foul and is an automatic sin binning, regardless of the severity of the contact.

What are your thoughts on Leigh being awarded a try when Hock knocked, on after Kirmond knocked on?

This

Re: Referring AGAIN : Sun May 07, 2017 10:36 am  

Deeencee wrote:

But 4 ft and 20 meters is a bit of a difference so shows u exaggerate things to favour your team

4 YARDS , not feet , still a difference , although the position was a lot less relevant to the offence

Re: Referring AGAIN : Sun May 07, 2017 10:39 am  

GUBRATS wrote:

We finished with 2 interchanges , but yours were self inflicted

It might have been just the 1 for you as well if your medical team had been unable to remove Hadley's teeth out of Hansen's elbow.

Re: Referring AGAIN : Sun May 07, 2017 10:45 am  

chissitt wrote:

It might have been just the 1 for you as well if your medical team had been unable to remove Hadley's teeth out of Hansen's elbow.

They could have done it at the same time he was having a concussion test for the incident

Re: Referring AGAIN : Sun May 07, 2017 11:01 am  

wakeytrin wrote:

This

Which bit of ' this ' ?

Re: Referring AGAIN : Sun May 07, 2017 11:03 am  

chissitt wrote:

It might have been just the 1 for you as well if your medical team had been unable to remove Hadley's teeth out of Hansen's elbow.

Did your medical team give Hansen his teeth back after removing them from Millers forehead ?

Easy this game Innit

Re: Referring AGAIN : Sun May 07, 2017 11:07 am  

The no try decision was the correct call. The ball was patted backwards in mid air but it bounced forward over the try line and then touched down. Penalty.

Re: Referring AGAIN : Sun May 07, 2017 11:32 am  

THECherry&Whites wrote:

The no try decision was the correct call. The ball was patted backwards in mid air but it bounced forward over the try line and then touched down. Penalty.

Was it a penalty ? , I thought it was a twent restart , suggesting a knock on over the line