Re: Referring AGAIN : Sun May 07, 2017 8:33 am  

In summary then, Leigh lost because of the ref and Wakey cheating.

Charlie does seem to see things realistically.

Re: Referring AGAIN : Sun May 07, 2017 8:50 am  

GUBRATS wrote:

3 head tests to be right , but 2 of them were when YOU were defending ! , one was your player slipped and contacted the Leigh players knee , the other one was Miller colliding with Hansen , splattered Hansens nose all over his face requiring the ball he was carrying to be removed from the pitch

So basically stop tackling with your heads

I normally do not get into tit for tat but when Kirmond dropped the bomb under the posts it looked like a knock on too from Hock before the try. Tit for tat now so players shouldnt tackle with their heads I agree Lyn got in a poor position on the 40 mere line and got injured Milky again and not sure about Hadley I think that was a clash of heads, if you think players with head injuries should be left on the ground whilst the other team are in possession then you need to mature. Did you see the tackles on Fafita one looked like a cannonball attempt and the other on his arm, if there is anything in it you will find out this week, but when a player suffers a suspected broken jaw you need to grow up oh and get yourself an abacus.

Finally you have 10 games left thats 20 points on offer so a maximum of 26, 20 was required last year for the 8s so its looking to be getting out of reach now for you.

Re: Referring AGAIN : Sun May 07, 2017 9:05 am  

REDWHITEANDBLUE wrote:

I normally do not get into tit for tat but when Kirmond dropped the bomb under the posts it looked like a knock on too from Hock before the try. Tit for tat now so players shouldnt tackle with their heads I agree Lyn got in a poor position on the 40 mere line and got injured Milky again and not sure about Hadley I think that was a clash of heads, if you think players with head injuries should be left on the ground whilst the other team are in possession then you need to mature. Did you see the tackles on Fafita one looked like a cannonball attempt and the other on his arm, if there is anything in it you will find out this week, but when a player suffers a suspected broken jaw you need to grow up oh and get yourself an abacus.

Finally you have 10 games left thats 20 points on offer so a maximum of 26, 20 was required last year for the 8s so its looking to be getting out of reach now for you.

8s was out of reach three weeks ago

Re: Referring AGAIN : Sun May 07, 2017 9:16 am  

REDWHITEANDBLUE wrote:

I normally do not get into tit for tat but when Kirmond dropped the bomb under the posts it looked like a knock on too from Hock before the try. Tit for tat now so players shouldnt tackle with their heads I agree Lyn got in a poor position on the 40 mere line and got injured Milky again and not sure about Hadley I think that was a clash of heads, if you think players with head injuries should be left on the ground whilst the other team are in possession then you need to mature. Did you see the tackles on Fafita one looked like a cannonball attempt and the other on his arm, if there is anything in it you will find out this week, but when a player suffers a suspected broken jaw you need to grow up oh and get yourself an abacus.

Finally you have 10 games left thats 20 points on offer so a maximum of 26, 20 was required last year for the 8s so its looking to be getting out of reach now for you.

Look , we lost , you won , but all I've seen over loads of social media is " 3 concussion tests , dirty Leigh " most probably posted by ' fans ' who didn't attend , when as pointed out at least 2 were self inflicted

In recent weeks we have had on average 2/3 concussion tests per game , but we've not been ranting about other teams being overly dirty

But what we've also seen is players being injured within feet of the sideline but then walking/ being helped off the pitch directly to the dugouts always when we've been in possession in an attacking position ' slowing up our momentum and giving the defence a rest

Some have been genuine , but some haven't , they have been used to bring on a fresh defender , it has cost us points

Yes we most likely will feature in the middle 8 s , we might even have to play in the MPG , we won't give it up yet

Re: Referring AGAIN : Sun May 07, 2017 9:20 am  

charlie caroli wrote:

Week in week out,its the same old story,Leigh always get the robbed by bad refereeing decisions the first quarter Leigh were terrible, Fifita just ran through us at every opportunity,we gave Wakey a 20 point start, got back in front then stopped tackling again.The Ref put Wakey on a team warning first,their reaction was play clean Rugby whist on it , he put Leigh on a Team warning and Tickle sees red mist, whatever tactics or BJBs acting contributed to our loss ,I agree Wakey slowed the game down and feigned injury unfortunately these tactics happen,for me the blame lies at the feet of the players,some are just not good enough,Stewart has been a terrible signing,he was hailed as a wonder signing by some,then you have Green and Burr,again not good enough,I know Reynolds and Vea didn't play yesterday but again they wouldn't get into any other SL side.
Where is our next win coming from?we have a chance at Widnes but that's it,the middle 8s are nailed on for us ,can we avoid relegation?Of course we can,but let's stop blaming Refs,the Crowd was our worst home attendance to date in the League,the We are Behind you cards isn't the answer,the North Stand will cheer when given something to cheer about,we need some players back fit,and get back to playing quality rugby,a bit of team spirit,and focus on a successful middle 8s. Moaning about the Ref or Jukesy coaching is not the problem.

Who feigned injury?

Re: Referring AGAIN : Sun May 07, 2017 9:30 am  

Adam_Harrison9 wrote:

Who feigned injury?

BJB , not sure there was any contact at all , certainly not with the head ' yet he was lied down prown for 2/3 minutes , then got up smiling and exchanging a Knod with Kirmond

All the rest were genuine , but also accidental , at least 2 when Wakey were defending , no penalties given

Re: Referring AGAIN : Sun May 07, 2017 9:39 am  

Impeding the 20 restart is a professional foul and is an automatic sin binning, regardless of the severity of the contact.

What are your thoughts on Leigh being awarded a try when Hock knocked, on after Kirmond knocked on?

Re: Referring AGAIN : Sun May 07, 2017 9:54 am  

dboy wrote:

Impeding the 20 restart is a professional foul and is an automatic sin binning, regardless of the severity of the contact.

What are your thoughts on Leigh being awarded a try when Hock knocked, on after Kirmond knocked on?

That's how it looked to me , but all three officials were very close to it , closer than me or you

We can go on forever though , Acton penalised for not regaining his feet 4 yards from your line , not surprising with 18 stone of Fafita leaning on him , should have been a penalty to us

Yet another close game , with the officials decisions being crucial to the outcome , maybe time for us to start ' playing ' the refs

Re: Referring AGAIN : Sun May 07, 2017 10:09 am  

GUBRATS wrote:

That's how it looked to me , but all three officials were very close to it , closer than me or you

We can go on forever though , Acton penalised for not regaining his feet 4 yards from your line , not surprising with 18 stone of Fafita leaning on him , should have been a penalty to us

Yet another close game , with the officials decisions being crucial to the outcome , maybe time for us to start ' playing ' the refs

He was on the 20 meter line - and deservedly got penalised, just about the only thing he did wrong mind the guy was immense

Re: Referring AGAIN : Sun May 07, 2017 10:12 am  

ColD wrote:

He was on the 20 meter line - and deservedly got penalised, just about the only thing he did wrong mind the guy was immense

Fafita was leaning on him , that's a penalty