: Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:38 pm  

RecreRebel wrote:

Haven are no Angels but Leigh are even worse dirty but sneaky with it.

the penalty count and referee would seem to tell a different story

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:56 pm  

RecreRebel wrote:

Haven are no Angels but Leigh are even worse dirty but sneaky with it.

Id love to see Hobbo ''sort'' Jackson out hahahahahaha.

I look forward to round 2.

same old crap from whitehaven you couldnt beat our academy team wait till our 1st's play

: Fri Mar 06, 2009 10:29 am  

BIG GAZ wrote: Having seen the game on dvd , I've got to agree about some of the peculiar decisions made by the Ref , especially in certain instances where he just chose to totally ignore the linesman. Seemed like Haven had 2 players binned for the same offence and although we had a better penalty count for , than in the Fev game , seemed like Haven rarely got punished for lying on and interference after the sin binnings. Meaning no more players binned. Lavulavu's cheap shot on Donlan was dispicable , he wasn't fast enough to make the tackle so chose to stop Donlan in whatever way he could , legal or not . Hope something is done with the on report via a disciplinary The comittee dont seem to agree with you there marra. http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... php?id=779

BIG GAZ wrote: Having seen the game on dvd , I've got to agree about some of the peculiar decisions made by the Ref , especially in certain instances where he just chose to totally ignore the linesman. Seemed like Haven had 2 players binned for the same offence and although we had a better penalty count for , than in the Fev game , seemed like Haven rarely got punished for lying on and interference after the sin binnings. Meaning no more players binned. Lavulavu's cheap shot on Donlan was dispicable , he wasn't fast enough to make the tackle so chose to stop Donlan in whatever way he could , legal or not . Hope something is done with the on report via a disciplinary The comittee dont seem to agree with you there marra. http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... php?id=779

: Fri Mar 06, 2009 10:52 am  

Maybe it would have been a red in another match but I would have been annoyed if one of ours had been banned for that tackle. Its not netball and I dont think it was vicious. Just big and daft.

But, big forwards know exaclty the likely outcome of a quick lad skipping round you at full pelt and what happens if you try and adjust your tackle, so cant complain if they get harshly penalised for it.

: Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:39 pm  

Alexs Dad wrote:

Maybe it would have been a red in another match but I would have been annoyed if one of ours had been banned for that tackle. Its not netball and I dont think it was vicious. Just big and daft.

But, big forwards know exaclty the likely outcome of a quick lad skipping round you at full pelt and what happens if you try and adjust your tackle, so cant complain if they get harshly penalised for it.

It's an arrestable offence if done at the wrong moment!!