Re: More good news for Leigh (NOT !!!) : Tue Sep 25, 2018 1:22 am
ColD wrote:
Not if the contract states it covers both SL and Champ I wouldn't think. But as we have a sports lawyer at the helm I'm sure all will be in the clubs favour
The RFL rulings quite clearly state all contracts are null and void. If Leigh as a club have contradicted those rulings by allowing clauses to be accepted and the RFL did agree (which I doubt) then possibly they may have a case. But ultimately the blame will still reside with the governing body.