: Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:29 pm  

EX.SALF.UNI wrote:

Nothing but admiration for the longevity of this whinge people.
Even Widnes' fans (who had cause to feel aggrieved) seem to have given up, but I see the Leythers are made of different stuff: Old, tired, used, repetitive, dull, anything-to-take-my-mind-off-my-own-club stuff. Long may it continue.

a bit like yourselves and the "sack mcrae, simms or whoever turn it is this week" moaning

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:31 pm  

leyther forever wrote:

Couldn't resist though could you

Why not just ignore us bunch of moaners?

We are obviously too delightful to resist

I'm an old romantic. Discussion here harks back to simpler times... When we won a game or two..!

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:32 pm  

Saintsnut wrote:

Why is it rubbish?

Read the reply again.

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:55 pm  

Both thick and humourless typical duper league fan

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:57 pm  

wbk666 wrote:

a bit like yourselves and the "sack mcrae, simms or whoever turn it is this week" moaning

Now now, that's any fan's prerogative after successive hammerings. Hilarious how much time we've spent belittling Wire fans for the same behaviour though!

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:57 pm  

EX.SALF.UNI wrote:

Nothing but admiration for the longevity of this whinge people.
Even Widnes' fans (who had cause to feel aggrieved) seem to have given up, but I see the Leythers are made of different stuff: Old, tired, used, repetitive, dull, anything-to-take-my-mind-off-my-own-club stuff. Long may it continue.

is this a description of your stadium or the style of rugby you are playing at the moment??

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:00 pm  

davo1979 wrote:

is this a description of your stadium or the style of rugby you are playing at the moment??

We're playing a style of rugby?? Few who've watched us would agree!

We'd still put 40 points on your lot though...

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:55 pm  

EX.SALF.UNI wrote:

We'd still put 40 points on your lot though...

True, but give us a million quid of Sky's money and say that!

I hope the SL clubs get their stadia. Saints deserve SL status on performance history alone. Wakey, Cas and Salford are on dodgier grounds (literally). Crucrucrusaders are a laughing stock as far as facilities go.

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:32 pm  

Wembley71 wrote:

True, but give us a million quid of Sky's money and say that!

I hope the SL clubs get their stadia. Saints deserve SL status on performance history alone. Wakey, Cas and Salford are on dodgier grounds (literally). Crucrucrusaders are a laughing stock as far as facilities go.

Saints shouldn't get in on performance alone though. They've also broken the salary cap a couple of times as well as not having a stadium close to completion so why should they get any better treatment than Wakey, Cas, or Salford?

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:38 pm  

The Kevster! wrote:

Saints shouldn't get in on performance alone though. They've also broken the salary cap a couple of times as well as not having a stadium close to completion so why should they get any better treatment than Wakey, Cas, or Salford?

At least they make Super League worth watching!! One thing Saints have had throughout SL has been entertainment value!!

Admittedly, that doesn't actually score you any points on a licence application - but it should put them higher up the list than the other three clubs mentioned.