bonus point : Sun Mar 22, 2009 5:56 pm  

Yeh well chuffed. I,ll leave it that till I get over it.

: Sun Mar 22, 2009 6:35 pm  

Didnt deserve one TBH after that first 60mins.

: Sun Mar 22, 2009 6:59 pm  

leytherjay wrote:

Didnt deserve one TBH after that first 60mins.

wouldn't have got one if Batley would have kicked all their goals! TBF we didn't deserve it.

: Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:01 pm  

leytherjay wrote:

Didnt deserve one TBH after that first 60mins.

Fortunately a game of rugby league lasts 80 mins and we clearly did deserve a bonus point!

: Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:47 pm  

RealCherry&Whites wrote:

wouldn't have got one if Batley would have kicked all their goals! TBF we didn't deserve it.

well we won the second half so yes we did deserve it even if we were pants for most of the match .

: Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:08 pm  

Brains left in dressing room, and alot of arguing between themselves on the pitch. Does Kelly have a problem with Durbin?

: Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:14 pm  

DemonUK wrote:

Brains left in dressing room, and alot of arguing between themselves on the pitch. Does Kelly have a problem with Durbin?

He obviously doesn't see him as a half back. When Ridyard came off he put Jock at half back and Durbin at dummy half. Don't think I've seen Durbin given a decent chance at half back yet.

: Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:29 pm  

In fairness I do think Durbin is best suited to playing hooker although he obviously is proven to have been as effective in the halfs as that's where he played for HSC.

: Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:51 pm  

i can't be;leive i was sat in the stands hoping we would secure a bonus point at home against batley, shocking.

: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:10 am  

BIG problems at LSV, it's bad enough going to the 'concrete jungle' anyway, but to watch crap (from Leigh) today, might throw my 'swipe' card in the canal to save further dissapointment. Next signing, an amateur player on trial ?l You get what you 'pay for' with signings, in Leigh's case this season, F*&K ALL !!!!