Stat Attack RD7 : Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:15 am  

http://www.downtothewire.org/wordpress/?p=434

http://www.downtothewire.org/wordpress/?p=434

: Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:42 am  

SEB:

is you scoring system fundamentally flawed as it suggests Vinnie Anderson had a decent game last week whilst it has been widely reported on here by all and sundry that he was rubbish. Your stats also suggest that Higham has been our most consistent performer this year to date whilst Rogues Gallery has proved he's been crap and not a patch on Riddell Wigan (who even Wigan fans acknowledge has been a disappointment to date - although that may be due to expecting too much).

Or do you think that your scoring system suggests that people only see what they want to see?

: Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:47 am  

Paul Youane wrote:

SEB:

is you scoring system fundamentally flawed as it suggests Vinnie Anderson had a decent game last week whilst it has been widely reported on here by all and sundry that he was rubbish. Your stats also suggest that Higham has been our most consistent performer this year to date whilst Rogues Gallery has proved he's been crap and not a patch on Riddell Wigan (who even Wigan fans acknowledge has been a disappointment to date - although that may be due to expecting too much).

Or do you think that your scoring system suggests that people only see what they want to see?

Yeah, there is that.

The stats do say that Gleeson was pretty darn good though, and he quite clearly wasn't.

[BOBBIE_IS_SUPERMAN]

: Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:13 pm  

Paul Youane wrote:

SEB:

is you scoring system fundamentally flawed as it suggests Vinnie Anderson had a decent game last week whilst it has been widely reported on here by all and sundry that he was rubbish. Your stats also suggest that Higham has been our most consistent performer this year to date whilst Rogues Gallery has proved he's been crap and not a patch on Riddell Wigan (who even Wigan fans acknowledge has been a disappointment to date - although that may be due to expecting too much).

Or do you think that your scoring system suggests that people only see what they want to see?

Oh sorry I must have dreamt this ?


• Sinners (Missed tackles + Errors + Penalties + Cards)
• Vinnie Anderson 35
• Adrian Morley 29
• Mick Higham 27
• Ben Harrison 22
• Chris Riley 21

: Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:55 pm  

SEB could you do us a massive favour and post Vinnie's stats on here ala Morley?

: Wed Apr 01, 2009 4:22 pm  

Lefty wrote:

SEB could you do us a massive favour and post Vinnie's stats on here ala Morley?

RD7:
Player Vinnie Anderson
Rating 311
Appearances 1
Tries 0
Try assists 0
Goals 0
Drop Goals 0
Meters 90
Carries 12
Tackles 33
Offloads 2
Attacking Kicks 0
Runs from dummy half 0
Tackle Busts 1
Marker tackles 6
Clean Breaks 0
Forty twenty 0
Kicks in general play 0
Missed goals 0
Missed tackles 4
Errors 2
Penalties 1
Red cards 0
Yellow cards 0

: Wed Apr 01, 2009 4:25 pm  

Brilliant, thanks.

So from those stats everyone. Would you say that was a bad game or a good game?

I think that is ok for second row. He is usually better when at loose forward.

[BOBBIE_IS_SUPERMAN]

: Wed Apr 01, 2009 6:56 pm  

SEB wrote:

RD7:
Player Vinnie Anderson
Rating 311
Appearances 1
Tries 0
Try assists 0
Goals 0
Drop Goals 0
Meters 90
Carries 12
Tackles 33
Offloads 2
Attacking Kicks 0
Runs from dummy half 0
Tackle Busts 1
Marker tackles 6
Clean Breaks 0
Forty twenty 0
Kicks in general play 0
Missed goals 0
Missed tackles 4
Errors 2
Penalties 1
Red cards 0
Yellow cards 0

Yup four missed tackles. Two of them that led to Celtic Breaks. One of the he just didnt look interested in making.Top game.

: Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:05 pm  

4 out of 33?

Who did you think had a good game?

: Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:43 pm  

Havent we had this missed tackle thing before....if you get rounded and stood up like an uninterested fool and you stick an arm out that is some distance away from the attacker, that doesnt count as a missed tackle.

to make a missed tackle you have to at least get some contact....