: Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:23 pm  

Rocky Bobby wrote:

I noticed that too. With one less game as well, no less.

Twice the amount of penalties, twice the errors and less metres.

You're welcome to him.

Don't forget, we had him for three years and that's why we got shut.

He couldn't find a man in a gay brothel.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:25 pm  

mark_m wrote:

Well those stats tend to support that Higham is a better player than Riddell. More tries, try assists, tackles, carries, attacking kicks, runs from dummy half, offloads, tackles from marker, tackle busts.

Cheers for flagging that up.

RG - I direct you to Mark M's post above. That's 3 to Piggy, and 9 to Mickey by our count, and he's played one less match. Yep. Welcome indeed.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:29 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

Twice the amount of penalties, twice the errors and less metres.

You're welcome to him.

Don't forget, we had him for three years and that's why we got shut.

He couldn't find a man in a gay brothel.

Logged on to read the end of this thread & without reading 4/5 pages of rubbish rumour, find it even more laughable that the pies are on here comparing the fat one with Higham. How did that happen?? My god they are obsessed with us arent they? Looking on the Wigan board, they were praying for us to get beat by Celtic yesterday. talk about glass houses their team is so crap they have to look elsewhere to throw stones.

Absolutely pathetic!!!

PS - We'll keep Higham, hes turning out just fine, thanks for the concern

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:43 pm  

wire forever wrote:

Logged on to read the end of this thread & without reading 4/5 pages of rubbish rumour, find it even more laughable that the pies are on here comparing the fat one with Higham. How did that happen?? My god they are obsessed with us arent they? Looking on the Wigan board, they were praying for us to get beat by Celtic yesterday. talk about glass houses their team is so crap they have to look elsewhere to throw stones.

Absolutely pathetic!!!

PS - We'll keep Higham, hes turning out just fine, thanks for the concern

So you didnt want us to lose on friday, its called rivals. And we didnt come onto here to be against wire we did it on our board so theres no problem

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:45 pm  

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... gby+League

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... gby+League

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:01 pm  

fazwigan4eva wrote:

So you didnt want us to lose on friday, its called rivals. And we didnt come onto here to be against wire we did it on our board so theres no problem

lets have it right bud i want you lot to lose every week, its almost as good as watching the wire putting a winning streak together

[Fantastic Mr Catpiss]

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:09 pm  

i'd laugh my booty off if they announced the signing of mark gleeson.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:18 pm  

See, what I don't get about all this is that, effectively it'd be a straight swap, Goulding for Gleeson, because Mathers obviously isn't wanted there, so as a seperate entity, you could do that deal you'd think should you be desperate enough.

Why on earth, would we entertain the thought of doing that swap ?

Goulding & Joel Tomkins - I'd be delighted.

Re: M Gleeson to Wigan = D Goulding & R Mathers to Wire : Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:21 pm  

fes wrote:

Sorry mate - but don't think much to your opinion

think what you want fes. he hasn't performed for us. full stop.

York 79

Re: M Gleeson to Wigan = D Goulding & R Mathers to Wire : Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:24 pm  

York79 wrote:

think what you want fes. he hasn't performed for us. full stop.

York 79

Now that's OTT, say what you want about his lifestyle, commitment and so on, but to say he's not performed is drivel, he's been our best attacking player alongside Briers for years.