I'm not sure I've ever seen Hicks being pushed into touch due to being too upright. He usually has the experience and sense to step inside at the right time.



I'd be happy enough to keep him.

More thank likely because he's over on the wing - it would require him coming centre field to put in the kick?



In regards to keeping Hicks? I think we should. He's a good professional, sure he 'doubled' his points so far after the Bradford game, but the same can be said for the whole team? That game alone added 38.5% to our total points scored prior to Bratfurt - so it isnt just Hicks that stepped up to the plate on Friday.



King (based on his improved form) and Hicks to stay.

Thats funny LWF was adamant the other day that Hicksy had signed for Union





Its not like LWF to be wrong...is it?

He has to stay, he is the only consistant import we have and wll worth his quota spot

Because he is a winger. If you want to drag a winger from across the field just to boot the ball down field, be my guest. Don't expect to score too many tries from the boot though.

Know i wasn't i said that i heard he had signed for Union, hardly adamant.

Of the imports i'd keep Hicks and King (TS improved him).

Monas? to be honest on current form i'd even get rid if he was homegrown but it's early in the season he might improve





Anderson x2 go



I'd actually not mind if Rah played for another season. He is a player that is slowly turning my opinion. At least he tries

Your word is Gospel on here.

That's your opinion is it not.

Back Tracking again matey?

Quote RL Lover="RL Lover"Back Tracking again matey?'" Not at all, just pointing out what what really said. viewtopic.php? ... &start=315

Quote RL Lover="RL Lover"Back Tracking again matey?'" Not at all, just pointing out what what really said. viewtopic.php? ... &start=315

It would be hard pressed to be anyone else's.