: Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:11 pm  

Richards is superman! wrote:

Im happy we didnt sign King and got a SL dreamteam centre on alot less money

and Riddell is better than Higham right

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:12 pm  

Richards is superman! wrote:

Im happy we didnt sign King and got a SL dreamteam centre on alot less money

And what about Morley.

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:14 pm  

Wire_Yed_79 wrote:

and Riddell is better than Higham right

Im sorry where did I type that, you should have gone to specsavers

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:14 pm  

manoa thompsons knees wrote:

And what about Morley.

Would have loved to get Morley. One of the best in SL.

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:15 pm  

Richards is superman! wrote:

Im happy we didnt sign King and got a SL dreamteam centre on alot less money

Who ?Hope your not on about Gleeson one of our rejects ,we well stitched you up there my friend

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:15 pm  

Richards is superman! wrote:

Would have loved to get Morley. One of the best in SL.

I dont think we put in an offer for Morley.

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:20 pm  

The signature says it all- Wigan in the 80/90s this, Wigan in the 80/90s that.

Lets have some truth, you are no longer the club to beat, like it or not, that honour goes to St Helens. St Helens achievements are far superior to that of Wigans in the early 90's. Today we have a salary cap to work to (albeit one you cant ever keep), when you had your Glory days you paid your players to work full time whereas every other club worked on a part time basis. Give me a break, Wigan are a bigger club

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:23 pm  

In Smith We Trust wrote:

The signature says it all- Wigan in the 80/90s this, Wigan in the 80/90s that.

Lets have some truth, you are no longer the club to beat, like it or not, that honour goes to St Helens. St Helens achievements are far superior to that of Wigans in the early 90's. Today we have a salary cap to work to (albeit one you cant ever keep), when you had your Glory days you paid your players to work full time whereas every other club worked on a part time basis. Give me a break, Wigan are a bigger club

How are Warrington a bigger club?
Better history? Nope.
Better record in recent leagues? Nope.
Bigger fan base? Nope.
Bigger name in world RL? Nope.

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:24 pm  

SPIRIT OF 74 wrote:

Who ?Hope your not on about Gleeson one of our rejects ,we well stitched you up there my friend

Yes I really wish we still had Mathers.

I am glad Mathers has played well at Wire he is a nice guy, but he could not handle the pressure at a club like Wigan, he was aweful at times, its good to see him play well. I would rather have Gleeson he has been quality so far.

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:29 pm  

SPIRIT OF 74 wrote:

Who ?Hope your not on about Gleeson one of our rejects ,we well stitched you up there my friend

nope, Carmont. And why cant both sides just be content with the Glees-Mathers deal. We are happy we got Gleeson and Mathers is playing good for you plus you got the money.