Re: Inglis : Sun Apr 18, 2021 9:42 pm  

rubber duckie wrote:

When the ball starts going through hands rather than having to kick, the big scores will come. I’m referring to GI being fielded.
There isn’t a great deal of taking on the line with ball in hand. It’ll come, and when it does...!!
This team is building up for a grand final. There’s only one team that’ll give us a challenge. Wigan.

Really...what about saints...they have won the thing for last 2 years...blimey should of kept the pubs shut if this is what it does to you

Re: Inglis : Mon Apr 19, 2021 5:49 am  

easyWire wrote:

I think poor Inglis won’t get the chance to shine playing like we are. Maybe if he gets the left slot and swaps with King. The problem is, he’s not coming into a well-drilled attacking machine where he can weigh in at the right time to show his silky skills - he’s going to be given the ball pretty much standing still and expected to do something spectacular. The six games he needs to get up to speed could make him look very poor.

He's on a hiding to nothing, he will be billed as the man who can sort out our faltering attack but nobody can do it alone. We are awful. No shape, the work rate off the ball is pretty or, no support runners just an awfully coached team. We aren't playing well so Steve goes back to his defense to get us back to winning ways! We were lucky that Sneyd had a stinker yesterday.

Re: Inglis : Mon Apr 19, 2021 5:51 am  

rubber duckie wrote:

When the ball starts going through hands rather than having to kick, the big scores will come. I’m referring to GI being fielded.
There isn’t a great deal of taking on the line with ball in hand. It’ll come, and when it does...!!
This team is building up for a grand final. There’s only one team that’ll give us a challenge. Wigan.

Wow, I get that you have faith Rd but this season and the one season of Inglis being at wire is a total write off. This coach doesn't get anything from the attack.

[Winslade's Offload]

Re: Inglis : Mon Apr 19, 2021 6:25 am  

This will not be very popular as he just saved us a point yesterday, but Mamo is not a centre. He can't make an opening for his winger, the interchange of passing that you see with eg King doesn't happen, his handling and tackling are dodgy. He has speed, good attacking ability and provides good cover but that is about it. If Inglis comes in I don't doubt he will be slow, but he will crunch the tackles and provide so much more for the players around him, particularly his winger.

Re: Inglis : Mon Apr 19, 2021 6:52 am  

Winslade's Offload wrote:

This will not be very popular as he just saved us a point yesterday, but Mamo is not a centre. He can't make an opening for his winger, the interchange of passing that you see with eg King doesn't happen, his handling and tackling are dodgy. He has speed, good attacking ability and provides good cover but that is about it. If Inglis comes in I don't doubt he will be slow, but he will crunch the tackles and provide so much more for the players around him, particularly his winger.

I do agree with you, mamo is fb/ wing cover and centre cover at a push he's an odd little character but he really puts a shift in for us which is why he's quite popular I guess.we

I can just see Inglis' main contribution being holding out his hands asking for a pass from Hughes that just won't come.

Re: Inglis : Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:54 am  

Ye Gods , we had a 7 tackle set at Hull with 2 set restarts on top & still couldn't trouble the Hull try line , whereas Hull were making more yards with the majority of their sets.
Our long term problem is surely not having any meaningful "through the hands" plan for playing the game.....5 forward drives then somebody thinks to try throwing the ball about which usually ends up with panic rugby. You're not going to get much variety with 4 forwards on the bench either.

Re: Inglis : Mon Apr 19, 2021 3:43 pm  

Put it one way, Hull were flat out trying to stop Wire. Disappointing the no16 speedster helped the score 2 from deep.
Wire had bombed 3/4 gilt edged opportunities to beat Hull by a score that I thought we ought to have had.

If Wire continue to play like they did vs FC but for more fortunate in a bounce of a ball, they’ll be very little but Wigan’s backrow to trouble us.

You all gave Wire no hope. I said we should beat them, and we should have. Wire a great amount of possession and threatened far more than Hull. The spoils even, Hull were lucky that Wire aren’t quite so threatening with ball in hand, but it’ll come...and I’ll remind you I told you so....again.

9—acres is closer to my way of thinking, he saw how much opportunity Wire created to put the game to bed and Hull simply didn’t have them but did get the ball down. You can’t always get the finish right, but the more chances of being in that finish situation you have, the more chances you have of winning more than you lose. GI will sort out those finish fails.

[Fantastic Mr Catpiss]

Re: Inglis : Mon Apr 19, 2021 4:10 pm  

rubber duckie wrote:

Put it one way, Hull were flat out trying to stop Wire. Disappointing the no16 speedster helped the score 2 from deep.
Wire had bombed 3/4 gilt edged opportunities to beat Hull by a score that I thought we ought to have had.

If Wire continue to play like they did vs FC but for more fortunate in a bounce of a ball, they’ll be very little but Wigan’s backrow to trouble us.

You all gave Wire no hope. I said we should beat them, and we should have. Wire a great amount of possession and threatened far more than Hull. The spoils even, Hull were lucky that Wire aren’t quite so threatening with ball in hand, but it’ll come...and I’ll remind you I told you so....again.

9—acres is closer to my way of thinking, he saw how much opportunity Wire created to put the game to bed and Hull simply didn’t have them but did get the ball down. You can’t always get the finish right, but the more chances of being in that finish situation you have, the more chances you have of winning more than you lose. GI will sort out those finish fails.

Re: Inglis : Mon Apr 19, 2021 7:25 pm  

CW8 wrote:

I do agree with you, mamo is fb/ wing cover and centre cover at a push he's an odd little character but he really puts a shift in for us which is why he's quite popular I guess.we

I can just see Inglis' main contribution being holding out his hands asking for a pass from Hughes that just won't come.

Mamo is also, along with Ashton, the only pacey, elusive threequarter we have. If he hadn't been in the team yesterday and backed himself to score, we lose. Sure, bring Inglis in, but don't sacrifice Mamo, drop Charnley instead.

Re: Inglis : Mon Apr 19, 2021 7:33 pm  

morrisseyisawire wrote:

Mamo is also, along with Ashton, the only pacey, elusive threequarter we have. If he hadn't been in the team yesterday and backed himself to score, we lose. Sure, bring Inglis in, but don't sacrifice Mamo, drop Charnley instead.

And drop ratchford and start playing Ashton.