Wellens is complaining that Asiata didn`t get suspended for making totally legal tackles on St. Helens players who unfortunately were injured, but Knowles was banned for making an illegal tackle when the player was also injured?
They lost, so the bias against Saints is obviously back, that's the only possible reason there could ever be for them not winning a trophy.
Fwiw I thought both incidents were a little unsavoury, the injuries weren't intentional though and the result of the game was a fair one IMO, Leigh were the better side.
Last edited by CW8 on Tue Jul 25, 2023 9:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Looked like a kind of horizontal shoulder charge technique to me, so I would of thought it would be against the current rules on that basis. The modern game, with all the emphasis on player welfare, simply can't sustain a situation where players habitually launching themselves horizontally head-first at each other, similar to these Asiata tackles and how Vila Matautia used to do years back when he was carrying the ball. I expect it will be clamped down on at some point. Probably treated similar to how 'hip drops' were this season.
Slightly ironic that at a time when the RL are trialling tackles below the armpit only rules, its two tackles round the legs that have caused so much controversy.
I must admit, for all the plucky Leigh, everyone loves an underdog, didn't they do well Bruce Forsythe-isms there is something a little unpalatable about them, and how they go about their business.
Any player who causes 4 injuries in one game needs to have his technique looked at. If he wasn't actually breaking any current laws then there needs to be consideration of a change of law and quickly.