: Tue May 26, 2009 2:05 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

He wasn't happy quite rightly about that penalty but he should know better with regard to abusing the officials.

Made no attempt to back up and let Carvell rise, RG, which is in the rulebook. Fair pen matey.

: Tue May 26, 2009 2:12 pm  

Rocky Bobby wrote:

Made no attempt to back up and let Carvell rise, RG, which is in the rulebook. Fair pen matey.

Carvell moved forward. Fielden should not have to move as he was directly in front of him. Fleldens hands were not in contact with Carvell or the ball and he was not stopping him playing the ball. That's why he was complaining as was Noble.

Watch it again.

The penalty should have gone the other way. Very costly penalty to Wigan as Riley scored off it.

: Tue May 26, 2009 2:46 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

Carvell moved forward. Fielden should not have to move as he was directly in front of him. Fleldens hands were not in contact with Carvell or the ball and he was not stopping him playing the ball. That's why he was complaining as was Noble.

Watch it again.

The penalty should have gone the other way. Very costly penalty to Wigan as Riley scored off it.

Don't talk wet! Fielden should have just moved or attempted to stand up instead of just kneeling over Carvell who was trying to get up to play the ball. Quite rightly a penalty.

: Tue May 26, 2009 2:58 pm  

The Punisher wrote:

Don't talk wet! Fielden should have just moved or attempted to stand up instead of just kneeling over Carvell who was trying to get up to play the ball. Quite rightly a penalty.

Well done that man.

: Tue May 26, 2009 3:01 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

Carvell moved forward. Fielden should not have to move as he was directly in front of him. Fleldens hands were not in contact with Carvell or the ball and he was not stopping him playing the ball. That's why he was complaining as was Noble.

Watch it again.

The penalty should have gone the other way. Very costly penalty to Wigan as Riley scored off it.

Putting your hands in the air does not make it ok... the rules state that the player must move away... he actually lent forward. Correct decision, disgraceful behavior to the official, should not act like a footballer!

: Tue May 26, 2009 3:47 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

Carvell moved forward. Fielden should not have to move as he was directly in front of him. Fleldens hands were not in contact with Carvell or the ball and he was not stopping him playing the ball. That's why he was complaining as was Noble.

Watch it again.

The penalty should have gone the other way. Very costly penalty to Wigan as Riley scored off it.

That was something a number of Wigan players were doing all game, the worst culprit being Sam Tomkins.

[Fantastic Mr Catpiss]

: Thu May 28, 2009 10:26 pm  

just in case we've all forgotten about this http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1029 it was actually briers that clarence was calling a bent nice bloke. i wonder what he was saying to the touchies when he was shouting and pointing at them.

just in case we've all forgotten about this http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1029 it was actually briers that clarence was calling a bent nice bloke. i wonder what he was saying to the touchies when he was shouting and pointing at them.

: Thu May 28, 2009 10:31 pm  

Tony Catsmith wrote: just in case we've all forgotten about this http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1029 it was actually briers that clarence was calling a bent nice bloke. i wonder what he was saying to the touchies when he was shouting and pointing at them. In the Panel’s opinion Fielden pointed in the direction of the match officials and shouted comments questioning the integrity of the referee. A nice way to put it there

Tony Catsmith wrote: just in case we've all forgotten about this http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1029 it was actually briers that clarence was calling a bent nice bloke. i wonder what he was saying to the touchies when he was shouting and pointing at them. In the Panel’s opinion Fielden pointed in the direction of the match officials and shouted comments questioning the integrity of the referee. A nice way to put it there

: Thu May 28, 2009 10:36 pm  

Tony Catsmith wrote: just in case we've all forgotten about this http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1029 it was actually briers that clarence was calling a bent nice bloke. i wonder what he was saying to the touchies when he was shouting and pointing at them. You must have been reading my mind as you typed this. That is the xact name I was thinking of as I saw this thread.

Tony Catsmith wrote: just in case we've all forgotten about this http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1029 it was actually briers that clarence was calling a bent nice bloke. i wonder what he was saying to the touchies when he was shouting and pointing at them. You must have been reading my mind as you typed this. That is the xact name I was thinking of as I saw this thread.

: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 pm  

On a disciplinary related topic, does anyone know what a 'crusher' tackle is ? http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1027

On a disciplinary related topic, does anyone know what a 'crusher' tackle is ? http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1027