: Mon Mar 30, 2009 2:56 pm  

Herb Narvo wrote:

Surely the truth or not behind this is only a phone call away?

Indeed, you are correct but as i said about the Reardon thing, sometimes things just don't interest me and i cant be bothered, if he goes, he goes, let him.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 2:57 pm  

getdownmonkeyman wrote:

It appeared t'Pies are quite giddy at the thought of this going through. It has got me thinking; who would you prefer to take from Wigan's squad? Of the top of my bonce, I can only think of Hock and even then he would have to improve his ball retention/decision making massively.

I would take Sam Tomkins and Hock but that's about it maybe Richards as we need a half decent kicker but the rest of their squad is pants .

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:11 pm  

Rocky Bobby wrote:

See, as I saw it I thought they DID get along. Wasn't it Smith who encouraged Gleeson to get more involved in games, running him out at SO for the England internationals? Seemed to be accomodating. Am surprised to hear that they don't get along. Furthermore I can't understand why a Wigan lad would insist he'd never play for his hometown team. Weird. I know it's what you've heard mate, but it paints an odd picture.

Goulding does indeed have bags of potential, and TS is the man to unearth it.

It does paint a very odd picture I agree - so due to that I wouldn't believe anything until at happens, if it ever will. Who I head that Gleeson didn't get along with Smith is in no way connected to Wire so I'm not sure where he's got the information from - possibly pi**ed up down the pub or from someone who is "in the know". What I do know is that there's no smoke without fire - so this Gleeson to Wigan MUST of come from somewhere.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:15 pm  

getdownmonkeyman wrote:

It appeard t'Pies are quite giddy at the thought of this going through. It has got me thinking; who would you prefer to take from Wigan's squad? Of the top of my bonce, I can only think of Hock and even then he would have to improve his ball retention/decusion making massively.

Christ you'd think we were talking about Saints not Wire wanting any of our players!!! I'm pretty sure we'd be able to muster more then just Hock in a combined team................about 10 more tbh!

As for Gleeson, i'd like him at Wigan but i'd imagine this rumour is the result of a few drunken players starting rumours around Wigan town centre.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:17 pm  

Dawson wrote:

If we got mathers then at least we would have a full back we could sort of trust.

(However, it did sound like Riley had a good game yesterday)

Riley did have a good game a solid performance I think that pople get on his back too much.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:32 pm  

NickyKiss wrote:

Christ you'd think we were talking about Saints not Wire wanting any of our players!!! I'm pretty sure we'd be able to muster more then just Hock in a combined team................about 10 more tbh!

As for Gleeson, i'd like him at Wigan but i'd imagine this rumour is the result of a few drunken players starting rumours around Wigan town centre.

This one is going to run; but stop being silly.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:37 pm  

getdownmonkeyman wrote:

This one is going to run; but stop being silly.

Not a case of being silly mate as lets face it we're both sh*t but i just believe your that little touch shi*ter then us

If the question was asked the ohter way i'd serioulsy answear and take Hicks, Gleeson, Morley, Carvell, Higham(as bench hooker) and Westwood but that really is it.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:39 pm  

NickyKiss wrote:

Christ you'd think we were talking about Saints not Wire wanting any of our players!!! I'm pretty sure we'd be able to muster more then just Hock in a combined team................about 10 more tbh!

As for Gleeson, i'd like him at Wigan but i'd imagine this rumour is the result of a few drunken players starting rumours around Wigan town centre.

Please name the 10 more give us all a laugh
And put down who they are better than in our squad please .I can only think of 3 who I would take from your total squad .Sam Tompkins,Hock and Richards.you would struggle to convince me anyone after those 3 .

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:49 pm  

NickyKiss wrote:

Not a case of being silly mate as lets face it we're both sh*t but i just believe your that little touch shi*ter then us

If the question was asked the ohter way i'd serioulsy answear and take Hicks, Gleeson, Morley, Carvell, Higham(as bench hooker) and Westwood but that really is it.

Fair enough. Totally relative though, where you need to strengthen, may not be our strongest positions and vice versa.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:51 pm  

load of nonsense if you ask me the only place Gleeson will go is Oz and the only one player from wigan i would want is Hock but only at end of season when vinnie anderson goes