: Fri May 22, 2009 11:33 pm  

just_browny wrote:

Incorrect.

You lot are more interested in blaming "The Communist Cap" than accepting that other teams are just better than you.

Incorrect.

A select few would rather blame the cap. Most of us realise that tonight was 2 average-poor teams and Warrington edged it.

: Fri May 22, 2009 11:44 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

that is my major worry, we need another big prop, (like you who have two bis enforcers) or he could burn out. He played 80 mins in france in 28 degree heat and did a full traing session at 9am next morning.
I wish we had secured Carvell when we had a chance

I agree with you. It's no good him doing 80 minutes if his contribution is less than two players doing 40 mins each, which looking at his stats it looks to be the case.

At Warrington we have a lot of big players in the pack. Morley, Carvell, Rauhihi, Wood, Westood, Anderson, Anderson, Harrison are all big blokes. Saints have a few smaller pack players in Flannery, Wilkin etc. and whilst this is working at the moment, it is a risk for the future, as you are over-playing Graham. Props should not play for 80 mins. Let's see when he is 26 how good Graham is. Morley has been playing for 15 years and is still at the top level, I do worry for Graham (for England's sake, not Saints!!!!)

: Fri May 22, 2009 11:55 pm  

RB wrote:

Incorrect.

A select few would rather blame the cap. Most of us realise that tonight was 2 average-poor teams and Warrington edged it.

I despise non-contributors.

Don't drag Warrington down because of Noble's slow down the ruck tactics.

It's embarassing to watch

: Fri May 22, 2009 11:57 pm  

getdownmonkeyman wrote:

I despise non-contributors.

Don't drag Warrington down because of Noble's slow down the ruck tactics.

It's embarassing to watch

I agree. I was very disappointed with Wigan'sapproach tonight, and despite Noble moaning about an 8-1 2nd half penalty count, I would suggest that they got exactly what they deserved.

: Sat May 23, 2009 12:01 am  

getdownmonkeyman wrote:

I despise non-contributors.

Don't drag Warrington down because of Noble's slow down the ruck tactics.

It's embarassing to watch

Nobby's superb tactic was in full view tonight, how they didn't get penalised more for it, i don't know.

: Sat May 23, 2009 12:01 am  

Fair play to Morley and Carvell as they were both outstanding i thought.

We're sh*t upfront and Warrington took advantage of that bigtime.

Plenty of improvement needed in both teams though imo but at least you can feel you have it in you.

: Sat May 23, 2009 12:02 am  

Dave T wrote:

I agree. I was very disappointed with Wigan'sapproach tonight, and despite Noble moaning about an 8-1 2nd half penalty count, I would suggest that they got exactly what they deserved.

When Thaler is nailing the ruck, you know you have a problem

: Sat May 23, 2009 12:03 am  

getdownmonkeyman wrote:

I despise non-contributors.

Don't drag Warrington down because of Noble's slow down the ruck tactics.

It's embarassing to watch

So now it's Warrington who want to play the freestyle, attacking Rugby?

Every single team in SL wants to win the ruck. That's how the game is nowadays. If a team gets a quick PTB, they are on the front foot. Most coaches use the same tactics.

Re: Morley and Carvell : Sat May 23, 2009 10:06 pm  

bigtoe wrote:

take a bow boys.. for me you won us the game tonight absolutely superb!! keep it up !

best props in the league unluky hull were gettin the best out of carvell lol