: Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:43 pm  

Inside Knowledge wrote:

Sorry about the confusion then, allow me to clear up a few things.

Sinfield - Warrington = Fact.

Feel free to move this to the bull shine thread

LMFAO

: Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:43 pm  

Ian [77] wrote:

Awesome.

So you guarantee that Kevin Sinfield will be a Warrington player - is that this year or next mate?

Pretty sure it's next year, not heard anything about him joining this year.

: Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:46 pm  

Inside Knowledge wrote:

Pretty sure it's next year, not heard anything about him joining this year.

Nice one. I'll tell you one thing mate - at least you have the guts to put your neck on the line. Much better than all this 'I know something but can't tell you' crap.

: Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:50 pm  

Ian [77] wrote:

Nice one. I'll tell you one thing mate - at least you have the guts to put your neck on the line. Much better than all this 'I know something but can't tell you' crap.

Hey im loving you che tony picture

: Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:51 pm  

Ian [77] wrote:

Nice one. I'll tell you one thing mate - at least you have the guts to put your neck on the line. Much better than all this 'I know something but can't tell you' crap.

Until it proves to be untrue, then there will be some excuse as to why he wasn't wrong, we just misinterpreted him.

: Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:54 pm  

SEB wrote:

Until it proves to be untrue, then there will be some excuse as to why he wasn't wrong, we just misinterpreted him.

Well, to be fair, he has clarified what is a 'fact'. There is absolutely no way he can sensibly argue his way out of the Sinfield one. If Sinfield signs for Warrington, we'll have to applaud his contacts. If he doesn't, I suppose we are all justified in laughing and pointing.

: Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:54 pm  

SEB wrote:

Until it proves to be untrue, then there will be some excuse as to why he wasn't wrong, we just misinterpreted him.

tbh i sincerely hope it isn't true.

Sinfield is close to being a has been.

Warrington need to start finding the will be's, if you know what i mean.

: Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:20 pm  

RL Lover wrote:

tbh i sincerely hope it isn't true.

Sinfield is close to being a has been.

Warrington need to start finding the will be's, if you know what i mean.

I do know what you mean. I do happen to like Sinfield, but usually champion teams aren't filled with players who've "been there done that".

: Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:43 pm  

Inside Knowledge wrote:

Sorry about the confusion then, allow me to clear up a few things.

Sinfield - Warrington = Fact.
Briers - Hull KR = Told.
Hicks - Union = Told.
Louis Anderson - Anywere but Depends on what his brother does = Fact.
Lockyer - Warrington = Rumour is'nt true, Fact.
Smith - Warrington = Rumour is'nt true, Fact.
SBW - Warrington = Rumour is'nt true, Fact.

Feel free to move this to the rumour thread.

Either post constructively or not at all...Wolfette

: Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:38 pm  

How can anyone NOT want to keep Hicks?