: Mon Mar 10, 2008 5:06 pm  

mark_m wrote:

Another point; why does Carmont have a problem with Hicks? He had a go at him in the tackle at least three times.

probly jealous cos hicks is world class

: Mon Mar 10, 2008 5:24 pm  

Paul Youane wrote:

SKY making a big play on him wanting to check King was alright before he went off was pathetic. To me he knew what he had done, he knew he had hit him bad and was now crapping himself that he had caused a very serious injury.

Its time to see how serious the RFL are about stamping out dirty play and dealing with intentional foul play. Mathers' "tackle" was a deliberate attack to the head and deserves 8 matches minimum. If it was the NRL the games he would get would be in double figures.

Said the self-same thing on here on Sat night and was slaughtered by the Pie trollers, not that I'm bothered.

Off his feet, and stopped a certain try - cynical, deliberate and meant. Not bothered about Mathers as an individual and the cynic in me says he hung around to make himself look concerned, just like a naughty schoolboy.

The book needs to be thrown at him, if only that this sort of thing needs to be stamped hard on.
The tackle was NOT mis-timed/accidental, and has he been a bad boy before ? - so what.

Lets see what balls the RFL has.

: Mon Mar 10, 2008 5:51 pm  

mark_m wrote:

Another point; why does Carmont have a problem with Hicks? He had a go at him in the tackle at least three times.

'Cos Carmont signed for the love of the club and Hicks signed for the money.

Ergo, Carmont shops at Aldi and Hicks shops at M&S.

Wouldn't you have a grudge.

: Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:52 pm  

keithcun wrote:

'Cos Carmont signed for the love of the club and Hicks signed for the money.

Ergo, Carmont shops at Aldi and Hicks shops at M&S.

Wouldn't you have a grudge.

And the fact that Carmont is clearly as crap as we were told he was. Even his hair is rubbish - what year is it? 1927?

: Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:55 pm  

Ian*77 wrote:

And the fact that Carmont is clearly as crap as we were told he was. Even his hair is rubbish - what year is it? 1927?

You should have seen him with his mane!

: Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:57 pm  

getdownmonkeyman wrote:

You should have seen him with his mane!

I'm sure Catpiss will sort out a picture for us to laugh at.

: Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:14 pm  

Gleeson thought there was a member of the crowd on the pitch there was that much waving of arms going on.

: Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:37 pm  

Ian*77 wrote:

And the fact that Carmont is clearly as crap as we were told he was. Even his hair is rubbish - what year is it? 1927?

I honestly thought i'd encountered the gayest thing ever in Warrington town centre on saturday night when skinheads ran over to me trying to kick off regarding a conversation they overheard me having about the "king incident." But that is pushing it close you big bender.

: Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:44 pm  

RobotMonster wrote:

[/b]

I honestly thought i'd encountered the gayest thing ever in Warrington town centre on saturday night when skinheads ran over to me trying to kick off regarding a conversation they overheard me having about the "king incident." But that is pushing it close you big bender.

Oh dear, and you say HE is pushing it? You are too.

: Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:44 pm  

RobotMonster wrote:

[/b]

I honestly thought i'd encountered the gayest thing ever in Warrington town centre on saturday night when skinheads ran over to me trying to kick off regarding a conversation they overheard me having about the "king incident." But that is pushing it close you big bender.

ooooh, get you.