: Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:38 am  

A Warrington fan slagging off one of his own is bad enough, but slagging off one of his own that happens to be one of the best centres in the world....

Either that or you aren't a Warrington fan, in that case, your opinion means about as much as Graham Appo

: Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:38 am  

Judge dredd wrote:

Todays made up fact.

No it isn't. He's always the person you 'attack'. (In the loosest sense.)

: Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:41 am  

So looking at a players performance objectivily is slagging him off? I happen to believe that you don't have to take a blinkered view of a team to be a fan.

: Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:42 am  

john_wilshires_physio wrote:

No it isn't. He's always the person you 'attack'. (In the loosest sense.)

I assure i do not have a "blinkered hatred of Glees'", so yes it is a made up fact.

: Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:45 am  

Judge dredd wrote:

So looking at a players performance objectivily is slagging him off? I happen to believe that you don't have to take a blinkered view of a team to be a fan.

Well the stand out moment of the tests for me was Gleeson's pass out to Ade Gardner at Hull, which is a classic example of his main quality. He didn't make many, if any mistakes, so yes, he did play a very important role in the 3 tests, as did anyone else who played in all 3 games.

Gleeson is probably one of our most consistent players of 2007, so instead of looking to find a bad point, start to realise that a 2 year extension of his contract is nothing but a good thing.

: Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:48 am  

Judge dredd wrote:

I assure i do not have a "blinkered hatred of Glees'", so yes it is a made up fact.

Okay whatever.

I just wonder why the hell then at every mention of the bloke, your like a broken record going on about his under performances. If we listened to you, he's been crap for us for 4 years and poor for GB.

: Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:49 am  

Optimism wrote:

Well the stand out moment of the tests for me was Gleeson's pass out to Ade Gardner at Hull, which is a classic example of his main quality. He didn't make many, if any mistakes, so yes, he did play a very important role in the 3 tests, as did anyone else who played in all 3 games.

Gleeson is probably one of our most consistent players of 2007, so instead of looking to find a bad point, start to realise that a 2 year extension of his contract is nothing but a good thing.

Out of the two centres playing for Gb, senior made a far far bigger contribution in attacks than gleeson did who had a 'steady' 3 games.
As far as his 2 year extension goes, i'm glad we are keeping him, i just hope we are paying a 'reasonable wage'

: Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:50 am  

john_wilshires_physio wrote:

Okay whatever.

I just wonder why the hell then at every mention of the bloke, your like a broken record going on about his under performances. If we listened to you, he's been crap for us for 4 years and poor for GB.

I've never said any of that.

: Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:50 am  

I agree with the Wigan fans.

Gleeson is poop and they must be delighted there is no chance he is going there. King is paid half of our total wage bill and is vastly over-rated. Add to that Chris (who?) Hicks who doesn't even make it onto an online poll and the lightweight one season wonder Kev Penny and you can see how poor our backs are going to be next season.

I wish we had Wigan's outside backs instead.

: Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:51 am  

Judge dredd wrote:

Out of the two centres playing for Gb, senior made a far far bigger contribution in attacks than gleeson did who had a 'steady' 3 games.
As far as his 2 year extension goes, i'm glad we are keeping him, i just hope we are paying a 'reasonable wage'

There's always two sides though Judge. Far more ball went left did it not. I thought Gleeson was effective without being brilliant. Defensively he was very good.