rubber duckie wrote:
Dunno how you can see it that way.
I see it as we needed Matty gone to get Charnley in.
I don't know about the mechanics of how the cap works and can be adjusted when moving players on particularly if we are still responsible for part of the salary going forward.
However, I'd agree with you that you'd think that getting Russell away was part of the process of getting Charnley in. I don't think that there's suddenly a pot of money for someone else