Being a coach at the top isn’t necessarily coaching, more about managing and creating a plan.
If you watch the Smith teams of 2011/12, it’s overtly clear that the players were instructed to offload on opportunity. They were directed to pressure the kicker and try and charge down. These are obvious traits instilled by the coaches to get the best out of the players available.
If you look at the South’s team that had the 4 Burgess boys in, they had a completely different approach. There was no such push for offloads, they saw the strengths being big men running hard and playing the ball as fast as possible, no messing around.
Wane’s teams are similar. Boring to a point, as the forwards don’t do much with the ball, but suffocate you in defence. The wingers pick up the slack and do the donkey work coming away from the line. Then it’s all about shape, running the right line and the pivots waiting for the defence to guess wrong, rather than them guess right.
The problem that we’ve seen last season and parts of this, particularly in defence, is that we’re not doing the same thing. Look at Minikin for the first try on Friday. We have the numbers right, but he shoots out for no reason, with the rest holding a straight line. Same with a number of examples early in the season with Matautia and Drinkwater doing polar opposites.
These are things within the gift of a coach. It’s not as simple player doing something wrong as with a dropped ball, they are just doing something different. If everyone did what Minikin did on Friday and shot out of the line and took a man, they wouldn’t score. Human error is unavoidable, but their is evidence to suggest that the players either don’t know the plan, aren’t following the plan or struggle when under fatigue/under pressure to recall that muscle memory to get it right, which boils down to preparedness.