: Wed May 20, 2009 10:36 pm  

Whats this about lets replace Briers with Long.

Its Monaghan we should be replacing with Long, bring in a new number 6 to play alongside him for a couple of years.

Bring In Sinfield as LF

We've lost the cost of Gleesons contract already when calculating for next year, we will probably be losing Briers' as well along with I suspect Vinnie and Paul Johnson

Should be room there to sign another winger for next season as well

: Wed May 20, 2009 10:54 pm  

If Saints don't want him why should we.

They don't keep players who are past their sell by date.

: Thu May 21, 2009 7:20 am  

Orford>Long

: Thu May 21, 2009 7:25 am  

No matter how good he is I can't get the horrible image of his long hairs and face out of my head. I don't want to look at it week in week out

: Thu May 21, 2009 8:20 am  

over the hill and past sell by date, only world class because of team around him, hang on didnt realy fire at international level world class? then did a runner when we got beat. what was reason oh I home sick / burn out. wasnt burnt out when we beat the aussies week before. in other words no we dont need him. go for myler plenty of years in the tank.

: Thu May 21, 2009 2:24 pm  

no way pedro

: Thu May 21, 2009 3:03 pm  

Mark wrote:

Orford>Longford

: Thu May 21, 2009 4:12 pm  

I am not sure about this; I think he could prove to be a player that pushes us into being consistent contenders but I suspect his body is starting to feel the years of playing at the highest level.

Just out of interest what does it matter what he looks like? How gay are those comments?

: Thu May 21, 2009 6:30 pm  

i would sign him age is not a matter look at rah 35 and still playing he could bring on the youngsters with the expreince he has i dont think it would to much of a bad signing

: Thu May 21, 2009 6:36 pm  

If Long signed, i'd go