: Fri May 01, 2009 5:44 pm  

[quote="The Wood"]Reilly
I thought Reilly looked suspect against Hudds, and was considering replacing him with Mathers.
Id have Grix at 6, Clarke can come off the bench for Higham.
i agree with everythin accept grix going to 6 , dont think hs played there 4 wire yet unless u move bridge to 6 and grix to centre

: Fri May 01, 2009 6:03 pm  

Grix played at stand off on Rauhihi Day.

: Fri May 01, 2009 6:04 pm  

Inside Knowledge wrote:

He try's his best not to because he's frightened of Stanley Gene plus he doesn't like playing against his future clubs.

I wish you would shut up with this drivel please...? Pretty please?

: Fri May 01, 2009 6:07 pm  

Inside Knowledge wrote:

1. Mathers.
2. Hicks.
3. Bridge.
4. King.
5. Riley.
6. Clarke.
7. Monaghan.
8. Carvell.
9. Higham.
10. Harrison.
11. Johnson.
12. Westwood.
13. Vinnie Anderson.

14. Wood.
15. Grix. (Replacement back or forward)
16. Rauhihi.
17. Mitchell.

with all due respect to our opposition that above team is still good enough to beat Hull Kr....

: Fri May 01, 2009 6:16 pm  

the flying biscuit wrote:

with all due respect to our opposition that above team is still good enough to beat Hull Kr....

We are going to struggle with an effective territorial kicking game though and I cannot believe the potential for attacking spark from Monas and Clarke will cause many sleepless nights in the Hull KR camp.

: Fri May 01, 2009 6:31 pm  

the flying biscuit wrote:

with all due respect to our opposition that above team is still good enough to beat Hull Kr....

No dispespect, remind me where your team are in the table again.

: Fri May 01, 2009 6:36 pm  

moxi1 wrote:

:lol: No dispespect, remind me where your team are in the table again.

No Disrespect but remind of the result on March 22nd?? on the back of our worst start to a season for years?????

: Fri May 01, 2009 7:37 pm  

moxi1 wrote:

:lol: No dispespect, remind me where your team are in the table again.

I've just had a look back over some of the past superleague tables to work out average final placings....you seem to be missing from quite a few super league tables.

So I'll say as a ball park figure your usually considerably $hitter than us....

: Fri May 01, 2009 7:59 pm  

Inside Knowledge wrote:

Your wrong here.

If you were to go with my team, Grix could replace Higham and play in the centre so Bridge can play at Hooker then Higham doesn't play the 80 mins, alternatively Monaghan to hooker and Bridge to number 7 and Grix in the centre.

What a Godawful set of unnecessary complications!!! Since when has Bridge been a hooker?? Haven't you noticed he's been good at No 3 recently? Grix is not a back, he's a back-row forward, so a poor substitute for Bridge at centre.

It's disruptive enough losing Briers: a wise coach will keep the shape of the rest of the team as consistent as possible with the one that has won its last two games.

: Fri May 01, 2009 8:04 pm  

the flying biscuit wrote:

with all due respect to our opposition that above team is still good enough to beat Hull Kr....

all a bit gung ho considering HKR are doing perfectly well while you guys are threatening to turn the corner from an abysmal start to the season.