: Sun Apr 26, 2009 5:53 pm  

hullkr-kev wrote:

Maybe his comments made the RL look at your tacticks,and they've informed the refs to clamp down

but according to you lot he wasnt complaining about our play - it was to do with how Thaler always ref's you lot badly !
make your minds up

: Sun Apr 26, 2009 5:55 pm  

Sounded a good performance from your guys today.

Can't believe I sacked Hicks from my fantasy team 3 weeks ago

Rovers v Wire is shaping up like a cracker next week.

: Sun Apr 26, 2009 6:02 pm  

GIANT DAZ wrote:

what's Justin Morgan's attack on Thaler got to do with todays game?

nothing to do with thaler my point is you are a team that just likes to use spoiling tactics (as what morgan said!) i.e holding down at the play the ball which also means slowing the play down. continually offside and not standing square this all comes down to you lot being a team that uses SPOILING tactics as Justin Morgan said

: Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:01 pm  

Having watched Huddersfield teams at every level this weekend, all 3 of their teams hold down for unbelievable amounts of time.

All 3 teams got beat so it didn't work.

: Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:13 pm  

bigbadboosh wrote:

nothing to do with thaler my point is you are a team that just likes to use spoiling tactics (as what morgan said!) i.e holding down at the play the ball which also means slowing the play down. continually offside and not standing square this all comes down to you lot being a team that uses SPOILING tactics as Justin Morgan said

no he didnt, he stated he wasnt taking anything away from the way we played or how we played it was to do with how he was fed up of getting the poop end of the stick every time thaler reffed them!!

: Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:17 pm  

GIANT DAZ wrote:

no he didnt, he stated he wasnt taking anything away from the way we played or how we played it was to do with how he was fed up of getting the poop end of the stick every time thaler reffed them!!

It is a double edge sword. Thaler is lax around the ruck and Morgan is a widge who always moans.

When we played HKR down here a few weeks ago, he bemoaned the amount of penalties his team conceded, despite winning the penalty count.

: Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:37 pm  

Did anyone see that mook behind the sticks near the west stand? He looked like he had just come from the Lord Rodney after a dinner time session. When Bentham asked him about Morley's effort he didn't have a clue and Morley nearly landed on him. What a waste of space.

: Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:39 pm  

Warrington Wolf wrote:

Did anyone see that mook behind the sticks near the west stand? He looked like he had just come from the Lord Rodney after a dinner time session. When Bentham asked him about Morley's effort he didn't have a clue and Morley nearly landed on him. What a waste of space.

As i'm edging (ahem) towards middle-age can you explain WTF a "mook" is.

: Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:44 pm  

Warrington Wolf wrote:

Did anyone see that mook behind the sticks near the west stand? He looked like he had just come from the Lord Rodney after a dinner time session. When Bentham asked him about Morley's effort he didn't have a clue and Morley nearly landed on him. What a waste of space.

Actually, he got that decision spot on, I think the discussion was around whether Hudds had made the first knock on. From lip reading, it looked like the ref said something like 'well done' to the in goal judge, as the linesman agreed with his call.

: Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:45 pm  

Herb Narvo wrote:

As i'm edging (ahem) towards middle-age can you explain WTF a "mook" is.

It's just a word that I can't get banned for saying!!!! I guess you never saw him then? He was walking like Rab C Nesbit and not even in line with play.