Re: Tonight’s game v Saints. : Fri Apr 21, 2023 9:35 am  

I wake up this morning disappointed as we have lost against the teams we are trying to overcome to win SL.

However

1. We have won 80% of our games.
2. We are probably the 3rd or 4th best side in the competition in reality currently.
3. We have good league position and barring any collapse will make the playoffs.
4. Powell will have seen our attacking weaknesses when the ruck is slow earlier, sooner rather than later. Opportunity to address.
5. We have good players to return.
6. The decision on Clark and Currie extension is now an easy one.
7. We have cap space to make additional signings this year.
8. October is 5+ months away.

Re: Tonight’s game v Saints. : Fri Apr 21, 2023 9:37 am  

Lomax ran the show. Masterclass!

Re: Tonight’s game v Saints. : Fri Apr 21, 2023 11:04 am  

Lord Tony Smith wrote:

People are allowed to be peed off having just watch us lose two games we were never really in against our two biggest rivals and two biggest challengers.

We were outfought, outclassed and out enthused in both. For all the talk about how many we were missing, Saints and Wigan were both missing lots of players too but they both wanted it more than we did. If you don't find that slightly concerning then - I'm sorry - we want different things for our club.

I'm sorry, when did we become genuine challengers?

I know the good start to the season as got many fans suddenly thinking we are world-beaters, but didn't we all agree pre-season that top 4 and a half decent showing in the play-offs would be a good season?

Fact is, we have had a good start results-wise (performances have actually been workmanlike & patchy rather than looking like some invincible side) and then with 2 rather weakened lineups we have lost to the 2 teams likely to be the GF finalists in October.

Call me easily pleased but I'll take what I've seen so far. Even in defeat, it was a big improvement on last season and I'll be more concerned if results go wrong after the break and we have what looks an easier run of fixtures.

Re: Tonight’s game v Saints. : Fri Apr 21, 2023 11:28 am  

Dita's Slot Meter wrote:

I'm sorry, when did we become genuine challengers?

I know the good start to the season as got many fans suddenly thinking we are world-beaters, but didn't we all agree pre-season that top 4 and a half decent showing in the play-offs would be a good season?

Fact is, we have had a good start results-wise (performances have actually been workmanlike & patchy rather than looking like some invincible side) and then with 2 rather weakened lineups we have lost to the 2 teams likely to be the GF finalists in October.

Call me easily pleased but I'll take what I've seen so far. Even in defeat, it was a big improvement on last season and I'll be more concerned if results go wrong after the break and we have what looks an easier run of fixtures.

Very true. It's unrealistic to expect to go from 11th to GF winners in one season. But top 4 and one or two playoff wins would be my balanced expectation. Obviously if we do more than that then great.

Re: Tonight’s game v Saints. : Fri Apr 21, 2023 11:38 am  

It was clear for both games, especially Wigan, we were miles off where we want to be with defensive line speed.
We ought to have beaten Wigan with fitness alone.

You can’t rely on holding back and trusting the defensive line when playing without big men.
Salford had to run around them to score, but when you are without props, teams can run right up the middle and have gained 10 yards already, plus an offload or the occasional line break, and your done!

If you can’t trust the defence, then you have to jump out and get on top of them early…they go a set of six and are lucky to make 20 yards before having to make a deep kick.

Gets off soapbox.

Re: Tonight’s game v Saints. : Fri Apr 21, 2023 11:47 am  

Someone is going to have to educate me here I don’t claim to have all the knowledge of the rules are if there actually any. Anyway I thought I read somewhere that it was about speeding the game up (which we evidently rely on)

So my concern before the Catalan game I knew teams would have to slow us down. Catalan had mastered that in one of their previous games and then Wigan done it to us and from the get go Saints done it to us. Now fair play they got away with it some of the laying on last night was embarrassing at one point I thought LMS was having a love in with one of our players he held on to him that long, btw I didn’t notice our players fight so hard to get up. So is there a rule regarding ruck speed I even saw mentioned in Powells post match interview he spoke of the ruck being 8 seconds.

Re: Tonight’s game v Saints. : Fri Apr 21, 2023 11:51 am  

karetaker wrote:

Someone is going to have to educate me here I don’t claim to have all the knowledge of the rules are if there actually any. Anyway I thought I read somewhere that it was about speeding the game up (which we evidently rely on)

So my concern before the Catalan game I knew teams would have to slow us down. Catalan had mastered that in one of their previous games and then Wigan done it to us and from the get go Saints done it to us. Now fair play they got away with it some of the laying on last night was embarrassing at one point I thought LMS was having a love in with one of our players he held on to him that long, btw I didn’t notice our players fight so hard to get up. So is there a rule regarding ruck speed I even saw mentioned in Powells post match interview he spoke of the ruck being 8 seconds.

I agree that we needed to fight a lot harder to force the ref into a decision. The first set of the match took a full minute to complete, with Saints lying on in every tackle.

Re: Tonight’s game v Saints. : Fri Apr 21, 2023 12:01 pm  

karetaker wrote:

So is there a rule regarding ruck speed I even saw mentioned in Powells post match interview he spoke of the ruck being 8 seconds.

It's always struck me as simply being at the referee's discretion, which is probably why, as fans, we moan a lot about inconsistencies in how it's applied.

If you recall our game with Salford a few weeks ago, I remember the ref suddenly getting on their case for slowing the play the ball at the beginning of the second half, after basically ignoring it for the first 40 minutes.

Overall, I think it's a problem that won't ever have a defining solution - Similar to the 10 yard defensive line, which is sporadically enforced by referees, it appears to simply be down to what mood the ref is in on any given day.

Re: Tonight’s game v Saints. : Fri Apr 21, 2023 12:18 pm  

Dita's Slot Meter wrote:

It's always struck me as simply being at the referee's discretion, which is probably why, as fans, we moan a lot about inconsistencies in how it's applied.

If you recall our game with Salford a few weeks ago, I remember the ref suddenly getting on their case for slowing the play the ball at the beginning of the second half, after basically ignoring it for the first 40 minutes.

Overall, I think it's a problem that won't ever have a defining solution - Similar to the 10 yard defensive line, which is sporadically enforced by referees, it appears to simply be down to what mood the ref is in on any given day.

Well thanks for that. It makes sense what you are saying because one week it’s fine then another week fans of any team are complaining about slow play the ball, if it is at all what you that it’s a referee’s discretion then sorry it’s unprofessional. It’s either allowed or you take it out the game. Like I have already said my view is/was the RFL are looking to speed up the game making it a more attractive watch.

Our game always seems to hinge on the speed we play the ball, if teams can stop that then we are doomed as we seem to have no other game plan. The only player we have that fights to keep his front is Vaughan. Within in minutes the game plan of Saints was clear slow the ruck, that and just generally up for it more we were or was it just confusion because we had no other plan. Worse game from Williams I have seen also.

Re: Tonight’s game v Saints. : Fri Apr 21, 2023 2:56 pm  

Dita's Slot Meter wrote:

I'm sorry, when did we become genuine challengers?

I know the good start to the season as got many fans suddenly thinking we are world-beaters, but didn't we all agree pre-season that top 4 and a half decent showing in the play-offs would be a good season?

Fact is, we have had a good start results-wise (performances have actually been workmanlike & patchy rather than looking like some invincible side) and then with 2 rather weakened lineups we have lost to the 2 teams likely to be the GF finalists in October.

Call me easily pleased but I'll take what I've seen so far. Even in defeat, it was a big improvement on last season and I'll be more concerned if results go wrong after the break and we have what looks an easier run of fixtures.

With the start we made, the squad we have, the abundance of forwards signed and the improvement of the pack, the fact that Saints have just lost one of their greatest coaches in the SL era and have had an indifferent start coupled with the fact that Wigan look like they are a Bevan French injury away from being a pretty average team, we should be aiming to be challengers.

Similar to Arsenal this season where no body expected them to be challengers but with the likes of Liverpool and City (to their standards) dropping off they find themselves in a unbelievable position where, never in their wildest dreams before the season started, did they expect to be top of the league with six games left after tonight. That should be the model this season, shoot for the stars and all that.

Also, don't give me the nonsense about finishing 11th last season. That team should never have finished 11th with the personnel we had and players performances were an absolute joke. I'd like to remind you that Leeds were 11th when Rohan Smith took over last season and went on to reach a Grand Final.