I'd rather keep Bullock over partington to be honest, Bullock was in great form before he broke his thumb. He's a good solid hard hitting prop, where as Partington is tough but smaller and more suited to loose/second row.....areas we are covered in. A guy told me we were signing Partington about 3-4 weeks ago and i didn't believe it.....although he also said we were signing Adam Reynolds so still don't believe it.
Partington won’t add anything to what we already have in Bullock. Age is the only difference.. two solid props who will do what’s asked.. if Burgess is wanting to topple the top three next season he’ll need a bit more than a signing like Partington..
I’ve no issue with exchanging Bullock 31 for Partington 25. Bullock has probably played less than half of the games we’ve played since he signed, and probably most of those off the bench doing few minutes.
That’s not enough for me, he can leave with my blessing.
partington isn't a prop, thats why wigan got rid and havard and byrne are still there
Partington is Jordy Crowther with less mobility and a nasty streak.
He's another player who tackles well but doesn't really contribute with the ball. You've already got that in Crowther. It's decent depth, but not a position you're not already well stocked in.
If looking at a squad player to add depth to the team then I’d resign George King.. keeps Toby happy having his bro at the club… and GK is more than capable of doing a decent job
If looking at a squad player to add depth to the team then I’d resign George King.. keeps Toby happy having his bro at the club… and GK is more than capable of doing a decent job
Not sure George would be happy moving from 4th placed Hull KR as first choice to 6th placed Warrington as a squad player!
If looking at a squad player to add depth to the team then I’d resign George King.. keeps Toby happy having his bro at the club… and GK is more than capable of doing a decent job