Re: This week’s disciplinary : Mon Sep 02, 2024 4:09 pm  

rubber duckie wrote:

Becoming a liability.

A threat to Tom Lineham’s crown.

I’m a bitter duck because he is a class prop and his disappoints over and over again.

Sam’s rant doesn’t make it any less of a dumb tackle to me.
He’s constantly letting his team down, and letting me down as a fan, if not the forum members that shout me down every time I have to make another post on him and my so called agenda.

Under current rules did you think it warranted a red?

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Mon Sep 02, 2024 4:30 pm  

Watched the incident again & it looks more like Trout colliding with Vaughan's chest.

[Wanderer]

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Mon Sep 02, 2024 4:46 pm  

3 matches for Vaughan and also Huddersfield's Fenton Rogers are simply absurd. (I note that Rogers got an additional match for another incident). The red cards may be in line with current rules but we are in danger of over sanitising the game. To add suspensions just seems ludicrous to me.

In a State of Origin game Ashley Klein would be getting on with the game and telling the players, if indeed they needed telling, to do the same.

Another example of where we are light years behind!

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Mon Sep 02, 2024 4:54 pm  

Wanderer wrote:

3 matches for Vaughan and also Huddersfield's Fenton Rogers are simply absurd. (I note that Rogers got an additional match for another incident). The red cards may be in line with current rules but we are in danger of over sanitising the game. To add suspensions just seems ludicrous to me.

In a State of Origin game Ashley Klein would be getting on with the game and telling the players, if indeed they needed telling, to do the same.

Another example of where we are light years behind!

Don`t watch any NRL games, but do their video ref interfere with the game as it`s progressing?

Liam Moore looked like he was going to play-on, in the incident where Paul Vaughan was sent-off, without even awarding penalty, then Ben Thaler got involved and the rest is history.

[Wanderer]

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Mon Sep 02, 2024 5:48 pm  

Boss Hog wrote:

Don`t watch any NRL games, but do their video ref interfere with the game as it`s progressing?

TBF I only watch the SoO games but based on those alone my answer would be no.

Boss Hog wrote:

Liam Moore looked like he was going to play-on, in the incident where Paul Vaughan was sent-off, without even awarding penalty, then Ben Thaler got involved and the rest is history.

I agree, Moore did look set to play on but once the Leigh player stayed down (quite possibly encouraged by team mates to do so) that's when the interaction between ref and video ref commenced.

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Mon Sep 02, 2024 5:49 pm  

rubber duckie wrote:

Becoming a liability.

A threat to Tom Lineham’s crown.

I’m a bitter duck because he is a class prop and his disappoints over and over again.

Sam’s rant doesn’t make it any less of a dumb tackle to me.
He’s constantly letting his team down, and letting me down as a fan, if not the forum members that shout me down every time I have to make another post on him and my so called agenda.

You can relax for the next 3 games Duckie, and there is no need to stress yourself out, until the play-off game, where barring any injury during training Vaughan will be our starting prop once again.

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Mon Sep 02, 2024 6:02 pm  

Boss Hog wrote:

You can relax for the next 3 games Duckie, and there is no need to stress yourself out, until the play-off game, where barring any injury during training Vaughan will be our starting prop once again.

The best thing for us.
Wouldn’t want him getting 3 games vs London.

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Mon Sep 02, 2024 7:31 pm  

The Bunker (the NRL ref ) do intervene, probably more than in Super League. But it's far more professional (not hard admittedly) and smoothly done.

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Mon Sep 02, 2024 8:28 pm  

At least Musgrove isn’t at risk of getting a ban…

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Tue Sep 03, 2024 6:50 am  

Wanderer wrote:

TBF I only watch the SoO games but based on those alone my answer would be no.

I agree, Moore did look set to play on but once the Leigh player stayed down (quite possibly encouraged by team mates to do so) that's when the interaction between ref and video ref commenced.

Well it may also be that he stayed down because he had just had a big shoulder to his head, which I’m sure you can appreciate would be quite an impact - the disciplinary seem to think so

Also, not read all of this thread but seen no mention of Thewlis, who “stayed down� a couple of times and it could be argued should have been green carded