: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:16 pm  

getdownmonkeyman wrote:

It's not Wednesday yet.

wednesday?

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:30 pm  

Presume he means in preperation for it being announced officially on thursday when all announcements are made.

Re: M Gleeson to Wigan = D Goulding & R Mathers to Wire : Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:58 pm  

Robbie Rotten wrote:

Now that's OTT, say what you want about his lifestyle, commitment and so on, but to say he's not performed is drivel, he's been our best attacking player alongside Briers for years.

Agreed totally.
I rate Goulding as a youngster but to swap him for Glees now?? No thanks, please no! If he's tempted to go to Wigan his NRL career is tits up in which case he can see out his contract here.
If Wigan want that contract they can pay for it...lots

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:22 pm  

These are two players not good enough for the Wigan 1st team, so they aren't good enough for ours.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:21 pm  

i wouldnt let him go , hes worth more than mathers and goulding

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:24 pm  

Wolfette wrote:

My understanding is Gleeson at Wire til end of season, then off to Oz.

heard the same thing , but if he goes to OZ who will take is place ,

: Tue Mar 31, 2009 6:07 am  

its in star now, apparently we have rejected bid and want cash. http://www.dailystar.co.uk/rugby/view/7 ... -for-Mart/

its in star now, apparently we have rejected bid and want cash. http://www.dailystar.co.uk/rugby/view/7 ... -for-Mart/

: Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:53 am  

With Wigan offering Mathers and Goulding, Wigan will have to be almost at full cap, meaning they'll have to offload more than just a couple of fringe players to get Gleeson in.

[Fantastic Mr Catpiss]

: Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:56 am  

i hope skento is on this like a hobo on a dead rat today.

Gleeseon : Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:01 am  

Deal i would .... but really we need half backs... what everyone else think?????