: Mon May 11, 2009 9:24 pm  

So why not Hull as well?

: Mon May 11, 2009 10:20 pm  

manoa thompsons knees wrote:

Been told his claim against Warrington is to do with the medical treatment he got from the club or feels he didnt get.

again we can use the example of Chris bridge doing ok with Exactly the same injury.....

i suppose it helped he didnt barge down doors either

: Tue May 12, 2009 5:34 am  

the flying biscuit wrote:

again we can use the example of Chris bridge doing ok with Exactly the same injury.....

i suppose it helped he didnt barge down doors either

Reardon is not the only player to pursue a claim over the medical, rehab, treatment, they have received from Warrington.

: Tue May 12, 2009 7:07 am  

Strange one this as everybody with inside information (especially Proclaimer look-a-likey St Helens fans) know that he has been fit for a number of months now. Sounds like a dodgey benefit scam to me.

: Tue May 12, 2009 12:13 pm  

I remember when the Reardon Saga came to an end, It was just after Bradford had released Tame Topou. To me it looked like we treated him quite fairly over the whole situation. He got a brand new suit out of the Tony Smith revolution that he could use for court appearances, He had been convicted but remained in a job and the final nail in the coffin was the Tame Topou release. Warrington didnt make a big deal of his court case.

One thing in relation to the inference of Reardon not being the only player to persue a claim with regards to medical treatment. Was I seeing things or did I see our former Physio on the pitch in the Wakefield v Wigan game at the weekend?

: Tue May 12, 2009 12:19 pm  

I reckon that if Reardon plays his cards right he could get a very nice sum of money of Warrington.

: Tue May 12, 2009 12:20 pm  

Latchford Wolvesfan wrote:

I reckon that if Reardon plays his cards right he could get a very nice sum of money of Warrington.

Thanks for the PM, and I realise you cannot post too much specifics on here, but what damages have been incurred by Reardon as a result of any alleged neglect/failure of duty of care?

: Tue May 12, 2009 12:27 pm  

Wires71 wrote:

Thanks for the PM, and I realise you cannot post too much specifics on here, but what damages have been incurred by Reardon as a result of any alleged neglect/failure of duty of care?

The simple answer is none.

: Tue May 12, 2009 12:29 pm  

Scandalous allegations. I hope the club don't pursue you legally.

: Tue May 12, 2009 12:30 pm  

Wires71 wrote:

Thanks for the PM, and I realise you cannot post too much specifics on here, but what damages have been incurred by Reardon as a result of any alleged neglect/failure of duty of care?

I think you'd be better off seeking an opinion on this from your corporate lawyer friend rather than a Peugeot Panel-Beater.