: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:11 am  

Fearnhead Cross wrote:

Personally I'd take the cash which would also free up some space on the salary cap so Smith can get the players in he wants

So he doesn't want Gleeson then?

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:30 am  

If we got mathers then at least we would have a full back we could sort of trust.

(However, it did sound like Riley had a good game yesterday)

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:54 am  

Dawson wrote:

If we got mathers then at least we would have a full back we could sort of trust.

(However, it did sound like Riley had a good game yesterday)

Are you still inebriated from the weekend?

PS

I wouldn't trust Mathers as a custodian of a pack of jelly babies in a nursery.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:43 am  

Are you still inebriated from the weekend?

PS

I wouldn't trust Mathers as a custodian of a pack of jelly babies in a nursery.

Well said gtmm Mathers was fine as a 17 year old on loan with us but has been poor with Wigan and wouldn't be worth the taxi fare

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:45 am  

moxi1 wrote:

So he doesn't want Gleeson then?

No, Gleeson doesn't want us.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:51 am  

What a load of codswallop this rumour is.
It isn't even a good entertaining one like the playoff clause one was

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:57 am  

Ritchie Mathers at full back?

Jesus, I'd rather have Martin Mathers playing there.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:58 am  

My understanding is Gleeson at Wire til end of season, then off to Oz.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:00 am  

WireFanatic II wrote:

Ritchie Mathers at full back?

Jesus, I'd rather have Martin Mathers playing there.

Marshall Mathers would be better too (only if he had Dr. Dre with him though)

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:02 am  

getdownmonkeyman wrote:

Marshall Mathers would be better too (only if he had Dr. Dre with him though)

Dre to replace Gleeson!